Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Express Printing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 107828 · Resolution: Canonical Vendor Id
Total Payments
$7,040.58
Client Filers
5
Payments
17
Activity Range
01/15/2006–04/01/2009
Largest Payment
$966.67
Graph: 5 connected filers · 17 payments · $7,040.58 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Hidalgo County Republican Party$3,341.68603/18/2009
2Hidalgo County Republican Party (p)$1,859.73504/01/2009
3Pachyderms Advancing the County of Hidalgo$1,168.02404/18/2008
4Rutledge Jr., Hollis V. (Mr.)$541.25101/15/2006
5Rios, Daniel (Mr.)$129.90102/13/2008

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
COPY ZONE
Vendor ID 74932
4 80.0% 46 8.5%
THE MONITOR
Vendor ID 322014
4 80.0% 86 4.6%
PROGRESS TIMES
Vendor ID 250813
3 60.0% 19 14.3%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
3 60.0% 390 0.8%
FROST BANK
Vendor ID 123488
3 60.0% 654 0.5%
Citrus City
Vendor ID 64874
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Clays Unlimited/ Sam De La Garza
Vendor ID 66811
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Mail-Pak Your Box Store
Vendor ID 200711
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Nueces Power Company
Vendor ID 228899
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Pankratz Systems
Vendor ID 236804
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
Sunshine Leasing
Vendor ID 300428
2 40.0% 2 40.0%
CP&L
Vendor ID 77786
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
04/01/2009Hidalgo County Republican Party (p)$966.67Printing of invitations
03/18/2009Hidalgo County Republican Party$81.19Printing invitations
10/13/2008Hidalgo County Republican Party$844.35Printing invitations
04/18/2008Pachyderms Advancing the County of Hidalgo$304.18Printing of PACH Invitations
04/18/2008Hidalgo County Republican Party (p)$125.57Printing
03/28/2008Hidalgo County Republican Party$599.71Printing invitations
03/01/2008Pachyderms Advancing the County of Hidalgo$129.90Printing Ballot Faces Samples
02/13/2008Hidalgo County Republican Party$584.55Printing newsletter
02/13/2008Rios, Daniel (Mr.)$129.90Campaign Material
11/13/2007Pachyderms Advancing the County of Hidalgo$366.97Printing invitations
03/02/2007Hidalgo County Republican Party (p)$86.60Printing
10/14/2006Hidalgo County Republican Party$676.56Newletter
03/13/2006Hidalgo County Republican Party (p)$555.32Printing
03/13/2006Hidalgo County Republican Party$555.32Invitations
01/15/2006Rutledge Jr., Hollis V. (Mr.)$541.25Printing expenses for campaign literature
Evidence basis: The canonical vendor was opened by stable vendor ID. A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.