Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Y Strategies

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 358477 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$456,370.49
Client Filers
4
Payments
57
Activity Range
11/10/2014–10/18/2024
Largest Payment
$64,355.58
Graph: 4 connected filers · 57 payments · $456,370.49 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Travis County Democratic Party$280,119.242410/18/2024
2Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$169,797.233102/15/2022
3Jefferson County Democratic Party (P)$4,366.00109/04/2018
4Urrutia, Bradley G. (Mr.)$2,088.02111/16/2015

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AUSTIN AFL-CIO COUNCIL
Vendor ID 23104
3 75.0% 70 4.2%
CHECKMARK TYPESETTING
Vendor ID 58877
3 75.0% 151 2.0%
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
3 75.0% 253 1.2%
WORLEY PRINTING
Vendor ID 357411
3 75.0% 256 1.2%
CENTRAL MARKET
Vendor ID 56492
3 75.0% 484 0.6%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
3 75.0% 906 0.3%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
3 75.0% 1,669 0.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
3 75.0% 3,017 0.1%
Fiesta Austin
Vendor ID 112240
2 50.0% 2 50.0%
Asian Family Support Services of Austin
Vendor ID 21311
2 50.0% 6 25.0%
Mercury Hall
Vendor ID 210295
2 50.0% 6 25.0%
The Rattle Inn
Vendor ID 323383
2 50.0% 6 25.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/18/2024Travis County Democratic Party$34,248.60Election literature
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$22,808.22Mail
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$22,808.22Mail
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$14,950.00Online Ad
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$6,168.96Canvass
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$4,500.00Consult
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$4,235.00Mail
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$3,771.98Phonebank
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$2,500.00Field
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$1,800.00Video
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$1,545.00Advertise
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$450.00Design
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$312.83Mail
02/15/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$300.00Outreach
02/13/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$9,170.56Mail
02/04/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$26,703.45Mail
02/04/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$4,500.00Consult
02/04/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$3,840.00Canvass
02/04/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$3,789.59Phonebank
02/04/2022Lyttle, Daniella Deseta (Ms.)$2,500.00Field
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.