Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
WYDEN FOR SENATE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 357947 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$98,900.00
Client Filers
18
Payments
39
Activity Range
07/01/2003–06/02/2026
Largest Payment
$5,000.00
Graph: 18 connected filers · 39 payments · $98,900.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Wyden for Senate
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
12 | 66.7% | 325 | 3.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
12 | 66.7% | 524 | 2.3% |
|
BILL SHUSTER FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 34927
|
11 | 61.1% | 23 | 36.7% |
|
RAFAEL ANCHIA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 254364
|
11 | 61.1% | 226 | 4.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
11 | 61.1% | 359 | 3.0% |
|
LISA MURKOWSKI FOR US SENATE
Vendor ID 192574
|
10 | 55.6% | 25 | 30.3% |
|
FRIENDS OF JOHN BARRASSO
Vendor ID 121031
|
10 | 55.6% | 33 | 24.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR JODEY ARRINGTON
Vendor ID 308700
|
10 | 55.6% | 45 | 18.9% |
|
BRADY FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 40578
|
10 | 55.6% | 66 | 13.5% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
10 | 55.6% | 289 | 3.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
10 | 55.6% | 297 | 3.3% |
|
RICHARD E NEAL FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 263514
|
9 | 50.0% | 13 | 40.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2026 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $2,500.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 07/02/2024 | Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 10/10/2023 | Calpine Corporation PAC | $1,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 08/08/2022 | Southwest Airlines Co. Freedom Fund | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 07/26/2022 | Teladoc Health, Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution |
| 07/19/2022 | Texas Instruments Incorporated Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 07/06/2022 | Recurrent Energy Group Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,900.00 | PAC Contribution - Federal |
| 06/14/2022 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. Texas PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign Contribution to Oregon U.S. Senate campaign committee. |
| 04/19/2022 | Austin Industries Cos. PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/21/2021 | Huntsman L.L.C. PAC | $5,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 12/21/2021 | Huntsman L.L.C. PAC | $5,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 12/15/2021 | TSVC, Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 07/07/2021 | Austin Industries Cos. PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 03/31/2021 | Texas Instruments Incorporated Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 01/29/2021 | Greyhound Lines PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/30/2020 | Texas Instruments Incorporated Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 07/20/2020 | HDR, Inc. Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 07/20/2020 | HDR, Inc. Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 06/26/2018 | Austin Industries Cos. PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/15/2016 | Austin Industries Cos. PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.