Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Whitney Bank
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 353535 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,260.14
Client Filers
7
Payments
214
Activity Range
02/26/2002–11/27/2013
Largest Payment
$813.97
Graph: 7 connected filers · 214 payments · $7,260.14 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Whitney Bank
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $4,286.22 | 38 | 03/04/2013 |
| 2 | Harris County Tejano Democrats | $2,240.00 | 164 | 07/19/2011 |
| 3 | Motheral, Linda | $428.00 | 2 | 11/01/2004 |
| 4 | Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now Political Action Committee | $131.50 | 4 | 10/31/2008 |
| 5 | Entex Citizenship Responsibility Group | $103.15 | 2 | 03/26/2002 |
| 6 | Parker, Bonnie G. (Mrs.) | $38.52 | 1 | 11/27/2013 |
| 7 | Rubal, Mark | $32.75 | 3 | 09/16/2002 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,480 | 0.2% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,536 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,327 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 42.9% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
vDao Direct
Vendor ID 343103
|
2 | 28.6% | 5 | 20.0% |
|
Mario Castillo Campaign
Vendor ID 203101
|
2 | 28.6% | 23 | 7.1% |
|
CHRISTIAN MANUEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62167
|
2 | 28.6% | 52 | 3.5% |
|
HYATT REGENCY HOTEL
Vendor ID 154413
|
2 | 28.6% | 61 | 3.0% |
|
Micro Center
Vendor ID 212683
|
2 | 28.6% | 75 | 2.5% |
|
ALMA ALLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 12280
|
2 | 28.6% | 99 | 1.9% |
|
SQUARESPACE.
Vendor ID 292370
|
2 | 28.6% | 118 | 1.6% |
|
ACADEMY SPORTS
Vendor ID 5434
|
2 | 28.6% | 192 | 1.0% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/27/2013 | Parker, Bonnie G. (Mrs.) | $38.52 | Checks |
| 03/04/2013 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $2.00 | Bank fees |
| 02/04/2013 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $2.43 | Bank fees |
| 01/03/2013 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $94.61 | Online Merchant account fees |
| 01/03/2013 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $3.30 | Bank fees |
| 10/26/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $7.50 | bank fee |
| 10/09/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $7.05 | bank fee |
| 10/03/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $813.97 | online donation fees |
| 10/03/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $357.67 | online donation fees |
| 10/03/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $59.20 | online donation fees |
| 10/02/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $38.44 | online donation fees |
| 09/28/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $50.25 | online donation fees |
| 09/27/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $20.00 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 09/06/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $6.60 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 09/05/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $0.12 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 09/04/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $209.18 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 09/04/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $177.82 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 09/04/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $24.70 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 08/08/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $446.89 | credit card discounts/fees |
| 08/03/2012 | Johnson, Ann (Ms.) | $91.70 | credit card discounts/fees |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.