Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

WHARTON JOURNAL SPECTATOR

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 352711 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$37,892.61
Client Filers
12
Payments
71
Activity Range
09/14/2000–01/17/2024
Largest Payment
$3,231.45
Graph: 12 connected filers · 71 payments · $37,892.61 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Friends of Gary Gates for State Representative$12,199.151903/05/2004
2Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$9,741.732305/17/2022
3Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$4,050.15610/28/2023
4Kolkhorst, Lois W. (The Honorable)$2,900.08210/13/2020
5Hegar Jr., Glenn (Mr.)$2,429.70302/16/2004
6Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC)$1,934.25901/17/2024
7Showalter, David W. (Mr.)$1,884.39102/24/2006
8Wharton County Republican Party$818.10309/01/2004
9Tijerina, Jaime (Mr.)$785.93105/21/2012
10Duggan III, Lee (Mr.)$485.00105/14/2012
11Bottos, Dorothy (Ms.)$344.40210/29/2008
12Hardin, Ben (The Honorable)$319.73107/05/2023

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
EL CAMPO LEADER NEWS
Vendor ID 100633
9 75.0% 14 52.9%
Wharton Chamber Of Commerce
Vendor ID 352649
8 66.7% 15 42.1%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
8 66.7% 1,571 0.5%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
8 66.7% 3,017 0.3%
El Campo Chamber Of Commerce
Vendor ID 100619
5 41.7% 11 27.8%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
5 41.7% 906 0.5%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
5 41.7% 1,876 0.3%
WHARTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 352687
4 33.3% 12 20.0%
FORT BEND HERALD
Vendor ID 116256
4 33.3% 65 5.5%
TRACTOR SUPPLY
Vendor ID 331811
4 33.3% 389 1.0%
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
4 33.3% 734 0.5%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
4 33.3% 946 0.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/17/2024Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC)$568.26Advertising for Fundraiser
10/28/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$987.54Newspaper Ad
09/27/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$863.04Newspaper Ad
08/09/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$780.00Newspaper Ad
07/07/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$463.52Newspaper Ad
07/07/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$191.60Newspaper Ad
07/05/2023Hardin, Ben (The Honorable)$319.73Newspaper Ad
06/07/2023Maher Jr., John C. (Mr.)$764.45Newspaper
08/02/2022Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC)$97.89Ad for Meet and Greet Candidates
05/17/2022Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$210.88Advertising
05/17/2022Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$210.88Advertising
05/09/2022Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$210.88Advertising Expense
01/25/2022Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$200.00Black History Month Sponsor
01/10/2022Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$200.00Advertising
01/13/2021Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$110.00Advertising
10/13/2020Kolkhorst, Lois W. (The Honorable)$2,501.60 Campaign Ads
03/09/2020Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$1,301.58Advertising
03/09/2020Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC)$196.952020 Candidate Forum
12/10/2018Stephenson, Phyllip Wayne (The Honorable)$781.20Advertising in Paper
02/05/2018Wharton County Republican Party Executive Committee (CEC)$304.702018 Candidate Forum
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.