Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Website

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 350482 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$605.44
Client Filers
4
Payments
5
Activity Range
01/18/2005–10/25/2020
Largest Payment
$197.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 5 payments · $605.44 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Dawson, Glenda (Mrs.)$394.00206/26/2006
2GARZA Jr., EPIFANIO (Mr.)$151.44112/20/2011
3Victoria County Republican Women's Club$35.00101/18/2005
4Tiedt, Jessica L. (Ms.)$25.00110/25/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TFRW
Vendor ID 315057
2 50.0% 259 0.8%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
2 50.0% 906 0.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
2 50.0% 3,017 0.1%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
2 50.0% 1,571 0.1%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
2 50.0% 1,958 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/25/2020Tiedt, Jessica L. (Ms.)$25.00media expense
12/20/2011GARZA Jr., EPIFANIO (Mr.)$151.44Website Creation
06/26/2006Dawson, Glenda (Mrs.)$197.00Chk#2002/Website
01/18/2005Victoria County Republican Women's Club$35.00to host website
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.