Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
WEBER FOR CONGRESS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 350422 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$317,253.74
Client Filers
44
Payments
175
Activity Range
08/08/2011–05/07/2026
Largest Payment
$5,000.00
Graph: 44 connected filers · 175 payments · $317,253.74 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Weber for Congress
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
32 | 72.7% | 524 | 6.0% |
|
TEXANS FOR SENATOR JOHN CORNYN
Vendor ID 308866
|
28 | 63.6% | 73 | 31.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
28 | 63.6% | 359 | 7.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR HENRY CUELLAR CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 308661
|
27 | 61.4% | 55 | 37.5% |
|
BRADY FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 40578
|
26 | 59.1% | 66 | 31.0% |
|
BILL FLORES FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 34592
|
25 | 56.8% | 46 | 38.5% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
24 | 54.5% | 325 | 7.0% |
|
PETE SESSIONS FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 242675
|
23 | 52.3% | 64 | 27.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR JODEY ARRINGTON
Vendor ID 308700
|
22 | 50.0% | 45 | 32.8% |
|
MCCAUL FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 207560
|
22 | 50.0% | 47 | 31.9% |
|
OLSON FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 232109
|
22 | 50.0% | 47 | 31.9% |
|
KAY GRANGER CAMPAIGN FUND
Vendor ID 175234
|
22 | 50.0% | 54 | 28.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2026 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 07/29/2026 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $4,800.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 07/10/2026 | Houston Pilots PAC | $3,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 05/07/2026 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 01/19/2026 | Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 12/15/2025 | Kirby Corporation Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution - US Representative - TX-14 |
| 12/11/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 11/20/2025 | The Continuum Fund, Zachry Holdings, Inc. Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 10/15/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 09/24/2025 | Celanese Corporation Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
| 09/19/2025 | Houston Pilots PAC | $3,300.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 07/14/2025 | Houston Pilots PAC | $3,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 06/27/2025 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 06/25/2025 | Southwest Airlines Co. Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 05/23/2025 | Calpine Corporation PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 05/13/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $2,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 05/05/2025 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 04/25/2025 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $4,800.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/15/2024 | Calpine Corporation PAC | $1,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 09/26/2024 | Celanese Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.