Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Waxahachie Daily Light

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 349754 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$81,795.02
Client Filers
19
Payments
118
Activity Range
10/06/1994–10/20/2023
Largest Payment
$3,535.00
Graph: 19 connected filers · 118 payments · $81,795.02 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Pitts, James R. (Mr.)$36,836.906002/06/2015
2Birdwell, Brian D. (The Honorable)$11,107.24912/01/2011
3Republican Party of Ellis County$9,240.501001/26/2018
4Knize, Wesley (Mr.)$5,912.901102/05/2008
5Carroll, Robert J.$5,844.97604/08/2010
6Ermatinger, Cindy G. (Mrs.)$2,881.10104/09/2010
7Wilkinson, Ronald L. (Mr.)$2,364.45302/25/2010
8Wallace, William D. (Mr.)$2,139.67204/27/2018
9Harrison, Edward Carl (Mr.)$979.25204/08/2002
10Kendrick, Lynnan (Mrs.)$782.25203/05/2004
11Davis, Rex (Mr.)$678.60110/15/2008
12Economic Growth Committee$588.00104/24/2017
13Bounds, Linda (Mrs.)$520.00304/25/2012
14Vote Yes for Waxahachie ISD$475.00105/03/2023
15Averitt, Kip$393.87201/17/2006
16Texas Democratic Women of Ellis County$348.07107/13/2010
17Red Oak Citizens for Economic Growth$253.25110/20/2023
18Deuell, Robert F. (Dr.)$245.00110/18/2000
19Renschler Jr., Richard (Mr.)$204.00110/09/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
11 57.9% 3,017 0.4%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
10 52.6% 1,480 0.7%
Ellis County Republican Party
Vendor ID 103682
9 47.4% 27 24.3%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
9 47.4% 1,571 0.6%
Ennis Daily News
Vendor ID 104880
8 42.1% 14 32.0%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
8 42.1% 1,536 0.5%
Ellis County Republican Women
Vendor ID 103685
7 36.8% 19 22.6%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
7 36.8% 1,876 0.4%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
6 31.6% 564 1.0%
Republican Party of Ellis County
Vendor ID 261750
5 26.3% 8 22.7%
WAXAHACHIE CIVIC CENTER
Vendor ID 349751
5 26.3% 9 21.7%
KBEC Radio
Vendor ID 175341
5 26.3% 10 20.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/20/2023Red Oak Citizens for Economic Growth$253.25Notice of Petition pub:10/25/2023
05/03/2023Vote Yes for Waxahachie ISD$475.00Ads
04/27/2018Wallace, William D. (Mr.)$1,167.09newspaper ads
02/19/2018Wallace, William D. (Mr.)$972.58Newspaper Advert
01/26/2018Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC)$300.00Digital Ad
04/24/2017Economic Growth Committee$588.00Ellis JP 4 Newspaper Ad
11/01/2016Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC)$623.50General Election Ads
10/25/2016Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC)$623.50GOTV print
10/06/2016Republican Party Of Ellis County, Local (CEC)$1,950.00GOTV digital
02/06/2015Pitts, James R. (Mr.)$55.00Ad
01/05/2015Pitts, James R. (Mr.)$490.00Ad
12/05/2014Pitts, James R$520.00Ad
11/05/2014Pitts, James R$275.00Ad
10/14/2014Ellis County Republican Party$450.00Newspaper Advertisment for Lane Grayson
10/03/2014Pitts, James R$220.00Ad
09/04/2014Pitts, James R$55.00Ad
07/16/2014Pitts, James R$550.00Ad
06/04/2014Pitts, James R$600.00Ad
05/30/2014Pitts, James R$750.00Ad
01/03/2014Pitts, James R$325.00Ad
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.