Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
WEATHERFORD DEMOCRAT
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 350179 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$102,117.10
Client Filers
20
Payments
104
Activity Range
01/27/2000–08/05/2024
Largest Payment
$4,380.00
Graph: 20 connected filers · 104 payments · $102,117.10 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- WEATHERFORD DEMOCRAT
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PARKER COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 238129
|
11 | 55.0% | 38 | 23.4% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
10 | 50.0% | 1,571 | 0.6% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
10 | 50.0% | 1,958 | 0.5% |
|
East Parker County Chamber of Commerce
Vendor ID 97899
|
8 | 40.0% | 12 | 33.3% |
|
HARTNESS PRINTING
Vendor ID 140917
|
8 | 40.0% | 13 | 32.0% |
|
Parker County Republican Women
Vendor ID 238131
|
8 | 40.0% | 18 | 26.7% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
8 | 40.0% | 1,368 | 0.6% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
8 | 40.0% | 3,017 | 0.3% |
|
The Community News
Vendor ID 317686
|
7 | 35.0% | 12 | 28.0% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
7 | 35.0% | 1,327 | 0.5% |
|
Weatherford College
Vendor ID 350164
|
6 | 30.0% | 9 | 26.1% |
|
FIRE OAK GRILL
Vendor ID 112854
|
6 | 30.0% | 14 | 21.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $606.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 02/21/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $606.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 02/13/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $456.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 02/07/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $456.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 01/31/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $456.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 01/24/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $606.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 01/08/2024 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $456.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 12/26/2023 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $456.75 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 12/18/2023 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $150.00 | Political advertising - newspaper |
| 05/18/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $1,660.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 05/12/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 05/11/2022 | Defend Texas Liberty PAC | $4,380.00 | Newspaper Advertising |
| 05/05/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 04/26/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 03/31/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 02/28/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 02/24/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 02/23/2022 | Hardy, Patricia A. (The Honorable) | $3,000.32 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 02/17/2022 | Rogers, Glenn M. (The Honorable) | $830.00 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
| 02/16/2022 | Hardy, Patricia A. (The Honorable) | $913.50 | Campaign advertising - newspaper |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.