Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
VINCENT MORALES CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 345318 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$566,800.00
Client Filers
39
Payments
224
Activity Range
10/18/2011–06/11/2026
Largest Payment
$13,075.00
Graph: 39 connected filers · 224 payments · $566,800.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Vincent Morales Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RODNEY ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 267559
|
31 | 79.5% | 187 | 15.9% |
|
ADRIAN GARCIA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 7258
|
30 | 76.9% | 96 | 28.6% |
|
GRADY PRESTAGE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 132610
|
29 | 74.4% | 62 | 40.3% |
|
MATT SEBESTA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 206223
|
27 | 69.2% | 43 | 49.1% |
|
ANDY MEYERS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 16900
|
27 | 69.2% | 45 | 47.4% |
|
STACY ADAMS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 293777
|
26 | 66.7% | 34 | 55.3% |
|
Tom Ramsey Campaign
Vendor ID 329690
|
26 | 66.7% | 51 | 40.6% |
|
SYLVESTER TURNER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 302244
|
26 | 66.7% | 209 | 11.7% |
|
LESLEY BRIONES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 190250
|
25 | 64.1% | 66 | 31.3% |
|
ACEC HOUSTON PAC
Vendor ID 5935
|
23 | 59.0% | 30 | 50.0% |
|
ED EMMETT CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 98938
|
23 | 59.0% | 75 | 25.3% |
|
JOHN WHITMIRE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168462
|
23 | 59.0% | 235 | 9.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2026 | Civil & Environmental Consultants Inc. - PAC - TX | $3,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 05/11/2026 | Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 04/16/2026 | Westwood Political Action Committee | $250.00 | political contribution |
| 04/13/2026 | Ardurra Group PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 04/09/2026 | HNTB Holdings Ltd. Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | To Support General 2026 - Fort Bend County Commission - Precinct 1 |
| 04/09/2026 | Freese and Nichols PAC | $1,500.00 | Support Campaign |
| 04/06/2026 | KCI Texas PAC | $10,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 03/26/2026 | Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. PAC | $3,000.00 | Contribution |
| 03/26/2026 | TSVC, Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Political Contribution |
| 03/26/2026 | RS&H Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Contribution with attending fundraising event for Vincent Morales, Fort Bend Cnty Comm, P1 |
| 03/20/2026 | IDS Engineering Group PAC | $5,000.00 | Ft Bend County |
| 03/12/2026 | HR Green Texas PAC | $5,000.00 | 2026 Campaign |
| 03/12/2026 | Cobb Fendley PAC | $3,000.00 | Fort Bend County Commissioner, Pct 1 - Campaign Contribution |
| 03/09/2026 | Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Texas PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 02/26/2026 | Quiddity PAC | $3,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 02/09/2026 | Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Texas PAC | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/17/2025 | Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/06/2025 | AIA Engineers PAC | $10,000.00 | Contribution - Fort Bend County Commissioner Precinct 1 Campaign |
| 11/06/2025 | Freese and Nichols PAC | $1,000.00 | Support Campaign |
| 10/15/2025 | GFT Infrastructure PAC | $2,500.00 | Political Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.