Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
VERNON DAILY RECORD
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 343566 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$25,456.06
Client Filers
8
Payments
42
Activity Range
03/07/2000–10/30/2014
Largest Payment
$11,436.45
Graph: 8 connected filers · 42 payments · $25,456.06 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Vernon Daily Record
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey III, Douglas C. (Mr.) | $15,554.28 | 8 | 11/03/2006 |
| 2 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $4,393.59 | 10 | 11/02/2006 |
| 3 | White, William H. | $2,139.00 | 3 | 10/05/2010 |
| 4 | Hardcastle, Richard L. (The Honorable) | $1,840.77 | 15 | 06/06/2011 |
| 5 | Collier, Michael | $515.02 | 1 | 10/30/2014 |
| 6 | richie, betty (Mrs.) | $493.30 | 2 | 09/27/2000 |
| 7 | Counts, David (The Honorable) | $490.00 | 2 | 08/13/2002 |
| 8 | ISBELL, DAVID (Mr.) | $30.10 | 1 | 10/07/2011 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
6 | 75.0% | 906 | 0.7% |
|
FOARD COUNTY NEWS
Vendor ID 115359
|
5 | 62.5% | 7 | 50.0% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
5 | 62.5% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
HASKELL FREE PRESS
Vendor ID 141106
|
4 | 50.0% | 6 | 40.0% |
|
Throckmorton Tribune
Vendor ID 327179
|
4 | 50.0% | 6 | 40.0% |
|
PADUCAH POST
Vendor ID 235716
|
4 | 50.0% | 7 | 36.4% |
|
BOWIE NEWS
Vendor ID 39788
|
4 | 50.0% | 15 | 21.1% |
|
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
|
4 | 50.0% | 355 | 1.1% |
|
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Vendor ID 14540
|
4 | 50.0% | 557 | 0.7% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,327 | 0.3% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,368 | 0.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2014 | Collier, Michael | $515.02 | Political print advertising |
| 10/07/2011 | ISBELL, DAVID (Mr.) | $30.10 | NEWPAPER SUBSCRIPTION |
| 06/06/2011 | Hardcastle, Richard | $325.00 | Ad for Community Guild for Vernon |
| 03/21/2011 | Hardcastle, Richard | $124.43 | Ad for Wilbarger County Days in Austin |
| 01/21/2011 | Hardcastle, Richard | $67.15 | Ad for Chamber Banquet |
| 10/05/2010 | White, William H. | $939.00 | Advertising |
| 04/29/2010 | White, William H. | $600.00 | Advertising |
| 01/20/2010 | Hardcastle, Richard | $54.44 | Advertising |
| 03/06/2009 | Hardcastle, Richard | $55.13 | Advertising |
| 10/23/2008 | Hardcastle, Richard | $225.00 | Advertising |
| 02/13/2008 | Hardcastle, Richard | $55.13 | Advertising |
| 02/19/2007 | Hardcastle, Richard | $52.50 | Advertising |
| 11/03/2006 | Jeffrey III, Douglas C. (Mr.) | $536.00 | advertisement |
| 11/02/2006 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $222.00 | advertising |
| 11/02/2006 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $61.46 | advertising |
| 10/30/2006 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $600.00 | advertising |
| 10/25/2006 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $500.00 | advertising |
| 10/23/2006 | Jeffrey III, Douglas C. (Mr.) | $1,338.56 | advertisement |
| 10/19/2006 | Jeffrey III, Douglas C. (Mr.) | $130.42 | advertisement |
| 10/15/2006 | Heatly, John Staley (Mr.) | $750.00 | advertising |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.