Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Various Vendors

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 342991 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,368.00
Client Filers
3
Payments
5
Activity Range
12/31/2007–03/31/2023
Largest Payment
$1,972.00
Graph: 3 connected filers · 5 payments · $2,368.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Committee to Protect Lakeway$1,972.00103/31/2023
2Stonewall Democrats of Denton County$378.00308/28/2008
3CONNOR, MADELEINE (Ms.)$18.00111/12/2011

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
2 66.7% 1,876 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/31/2023Committee to Protect Lakeway$1,972.00BBQ and refreshments for fund raising events
11/12/2011CONNOR, MADELEINE (Ms.)$18.00Unpaid Volunteer lunch/beverages Pflugerville Chili Cookoff
08/28/2008Stonewall Democrats of Denton County$45.00Various silent auction items @ $5 each.
02/28/2008Stonewall Democrats of Denton County$60.00Reimbursements on postage web hosting promotion material to various suppliers in small amounts
12/31/2007Stonewall Democrats of Denton County$273.00Reimbursements on postage web hosting promotion material to various suppliers in small amounts
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.