Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

VARIOUS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 342976 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$13,168.17
Client Filers
11
Payments
23
Activity Range
07/30/2000–02/23/2026
Largest Payment
$4,000.00
Graph: 11 connected filers · 23 payments · $13,168.17 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Martinez, Miriam (Mrs.)$4,000.00111/30/2013
2Lost Pines Republican Women$1,959.63206/30/2024
3Birschbach, James (Mr.)$1,620.00202/23/2026
4Wichita County Republican Women$1,487.69203/31/2014
5Kreger, Charles (Mr.)$1,290.75202/28/2004
6McKinney Tea Party, Inc.$1,001.55212/31/2019
7Gaultney, David B. (Mr.)$1,000.00511/30/2000
8Williams County Republican Party Gen Elec Campaign Fund$617.59305/25/2004
9Hall, Ursula A. (Ms.)$95.00203/02/2010
10Diverse Alief Democrats$62.00102/02/2018
11Nagle, Stephen (Mr.)$33.96112/31/2009

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
6 54.5% 1,360 0.4%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
5 45.5% 1,480 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
5 45.5% 1,958 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 45.5% 3,017 0.2%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
4 36.4% 1,536 0.3%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
4 36.4% 1,445 0.3%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
4 36.4% 1,876 0.2%
US POST OFFICE
Vendor ID 340255
3 27.3% 431 0.7%
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 336943
3 27.3% 557 0.5%
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
3 27.3% 734 0.4%
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
3 27.3% 696 0.4%
WAL-MART
Vendor ID 347528
3 27.3% 714 0.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/23/2026Birschbach, James (Mr.)$810.00Meet N Greet/Fund Raising
06/30/2024Lost Pines Republican Women$1,549.88Non-itemized expenses under $220
12/31/2019McKinney Tea Party, Inc.$397.36general operational expenses - no political expenses this half.
06/30/2019Lost Pines Republican Women$409.75 Party Supplies, Fee, Reimbursements, Dues, Office Supplies, Event Food and Drinks
06/30/2018McKinney Tea Party, Inc.$604.19Yard signs, door hangers, flyers, supplies
02/02/2018Diverse Alief Democrats$62.00Office overhead
03/31/2014Wichita County Republican Women$158.06MISC OVERHEAD
11/30/2013Martinez, Miriam (Mrs.)$4,000.00Hotel and Food
10/21/2013Wichita County Republican Women$1,329.63REIMBURSE FUNDRAISING EXPENSES
03/02/2010Hall, Ursula A. (Ms.)$45.00Food drinks and misc for GOTV activities
02/24/2010Hall, Ursula A. (Ms.)$50.00Food beverage and misc for GOTV activities
12/31/2009Nagle, Stephen (Mr.)$33.96Payments for which there is no record presently available.
05/25/2004Williams County Republican Party Gen Elec Campaign Fund$407.38HQ general expense Georgetown
05/25/2004Williams County Republican Party Gen Elec Campaign Fund$157.20Cedar Park HQ general expense
03/01/2004Williams County Republican Party Gen Elec Campaign Fund$53.01Reagan Day dinner miscellaneous expenses
02/28/2004Kreger, Charles (Mr.)$874.50Milage
01/29/2004Kreger, Charles (Mr.)$416.25Milage
11/30/2000Gaultney, David B. (Mr.)$200.00Gasoline and mileage for November
10/30/2000Gaultney, David B. (Mr.)$200.00Gasoline and mileage for October
09/28/2000Gaultney, David B. (Mr.)$200.00Gasoline and mileage for September
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.