Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
United Site Services
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 338298 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$13,543.38
Client Filers
6
Payments
45
Activity Range
02/09/2009–12/29/2016
Largest Payment
$898.28
Graph: 6 connected filers · 45 payments · $13,543.38 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- United Site Services
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workman for Texas | $9,415.41 | 36 | 12/29/2016 |
| 2 | Travis County Democratic Party | $1,922.02 | 3 | 12/03/2016 |
| 3 | Colin County Tea Party | $1,122.34 | 2 | 08/26/2009 |
| 4 | Mexican American Legislative Caucus | $826.78 | 2 | 08/26/2011 |
| 5 | Farias, Joe (Mr.) | $181.83 | 1 | 01/23/2013 |
| 6 | San Antonio Police Officers Associaction PAC | $75.00 | 1 | 02/09/2009 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
6 | 100.0% | 1,101 | 0.5% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
6 | 100.0% | 1,876 | 0.3% |
|
MICHAELS
Vendor ID 212366
|
5 | 83.3% | 366 | 1.4% |
|
CONSTANT CONTACT
Vendor ID 73952
|
5 | 83.3% | 629 | 0.8% |
|
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
|
5 | 83.3% | 649 | 0.8% |
|
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
|
5 | 83.3% | 734 | 0.7% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,077 | 0.5% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,327 | 0.4% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,360 | 0.4% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,174 | 0.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
5 | 83.3% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/29/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Campaign office expense |
| 12/03/2016 | Travis County Democratic Party | $330.18 | fencing |
| 10/18/2016 | Travis County Democratic Party | $898.28 | Fencing |
| 10/18/2016 | Travis County Democratic Party | $693.56 | Fence |
| 10/18/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Candidate office overhead expense |
| 10/07/2016 | Workman for Texas | $418.11 | Candidate rental expense |
| 08/21/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Campaign office rental fee expense |
| 07/25/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Candidate Office rental fee expense |
| 07/25/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Campaign Office rental fees |
| 06/24/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Campaign Office Overhead/Rental Expense |
| 04/25/2016 | Workman for Texas | $295.82 | Campaign Office Expense |
| 03/30/2016 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign Office Expense |
| 03/04/2016 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign Office Expense |
| 02/04/2016 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign office expense |
| 01/18/2016 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign office expense |
| 12/16/2015 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign office services expense |
| 11/09/2015 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign office services expense |
| 10/16/2015 | Workman for Texas | $286.02 | Campaign office services expense |
| 09/26/2015 | Workman for Texas | $469.35 | Campaign office services expense |
| 01/23/2013 | Farias, Joe (Mr.) | $181.83 | port-o-potties for bergs mill veterans event |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.