Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

UZ MARKETING

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Media Advertising
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 341638 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$267,663.66
Client Filers
107
Payments
438
Activity Range
07/29/2011–06/25/2026
Largest Payment
$5,916.21
Graph: 107 connected filers · 438 payments · $267,663.66 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Louderback, Andrew J. (The Honorable)$28,934.361810/23/2025
2McConnico, Ryan T. (Mr.)$13,736.061310/25/2022
3Wright, Jay M. (Mr.)$13,471.641211/23/2021
4Republican Executive Committee of Comal County$12,566.512308/22/2023
5West, Chase E. (Mr.)$8,598.486210/20/2024
6GC Bond 23$7,517.41310/30/2023
7Truong, Lily P. (Mrs.)$7,091.471109/19/2022
8Carmona, Christopher R. (Mr.)$6,648.581609/26/2022
9Harris County Republican Party (CEC)$6,332.62212/01/2022
10Hull, Lacey M. (The Honorable)$6,245.66410/28/2024
11Shaw, Penny (The Honorable)$6,123.231211/29/2022
12Gonzalez, Phyllis Martinez (Mrs.)$5,768.72409/17/2020
13Williams, David Mark (Mr.)$5,567.92701/16/2022
14Garcia, Adrian$5,123.00602/10/2020
15Miller, Charles E$5,052.42502/14/2026
16Fraga, Michelle M. (Mrs.)$4,909.08505/03/2018
17Lowe, David O. (Mr.)$4,852.64303/18/2022
18Pulcher, Jessica J. (Ms.)$4,413.72111/09/2021
19Vote Yes Waller ISD$3,951.89510/07/2022
20Lee, Daniel (Mr.)$3,849.06208/13/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
48 44.9% 1,638 2.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
40 37.4% 3,017 1.3%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
35 32.7% 1,876 1.8%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
33 30.8% 1,958 1.6%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
29 27.1% 1,174 2.3%
VISTAPRINT
Vendor ID 345837
28 26.2% 741 3.4%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
26 24.3% 1,536 1.6%
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
22 20.6% 457 4.1%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
22 20.6% 1,571 1.3%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
21 19.6% 1,669 1.2%
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
20 18.7% 642 2.7%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
18 16.8% 620 2.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/25/2026Michna, Michael A. (Mr.)$433.00Shirts
06/23/2026Williams, Michelle L. (Ms.)$805.36Yard signs
06/15/2026Pritchard, R. Wayne$260.00Campaign Banners
06/12/2026Ho, Andie$1,636.92Yard signs
06/12/2026Evans, Julie (Mrs.)$467.56Signs
06/11/2026Martinez-Salas, Amy O.$364.91Marketing materials
05/29/2026Ramos, Lizbeth$172.15Buttons
05/29/2026Ho, Andie$120.14Postcards
05/26/2026Barton, Valorie (Ms.)$183.89CAMPAIGN BUTTONS
05/21/2026Barton, Valorie (Ms.)$646.81YARD SIGNS -STAKES-TRUCK MAGNETS
05/19/2026Ho, Andie$648.42Yard signs
05/11/2026Gibson, Zachary (Mr.)$687.23manufacture of yard signs and t shirts
05/11/2026Gibson, Zachary (Mr.)$422.72manufacture of yard signs and t shirts
05/10/2026Nelson, Veronica M. (The Honorable)$431.92campaing material
04/11/2026Richardson, Amanda (Ms.)$468.62Signs
04/06/2026Hernandez, Jacqueline (Ms.)$322.86Advertising/marketing
03/23/2026Michna, Michael A. (Mr.)$183.45Signs
03/20/2026Michna, Michael A. (Mr.)$51.31Signs
02/17/2026Ramos, Lizbeth$831.35Push cards, Business Cards, Yard Signs
02/15/2026Cruz, Bernardo R. (Mr.)$326.46 Campaign yard signs.
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.