Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Triumph Solutions Group
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 333863 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$36,751.20
Client Filers
2
Payments
26
Activity Range
12/10/2001–02/20/2004
Largest Payment
$4,000.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 26 payments · $36,751.20 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Triumph Solutions Group
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $21,276.20 | 15 | 08/05/2002 |
| 2 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $15,475.00 | 11 | 02/20/2004 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP
Vendor ID 51508
|
2 | 100.0% | 27 | 7.4% |
|
Nuevo Leon Restaurant
Vendor ID 228939
|
2 | 100.0% | 30 | 6.7% |
|
EL SOL Y LA LUNA
Vendor ID 102032
|
2 | 100.0% | 41 | 4.9% |
|
TEXAS OBSERVER
Vendor ID 312826
|
2 | 100.0% | 47 | 4.3% |
|
CAPITAL AREA PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 50946
|
2 | 100.0% | 54 | 3.7% |
|
AUSTIN TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 24208
|
2 | 100.0% | 64 | 3.1% |
|
South Austin Democrats
Vendor ID 288373
|
2 | 100.0% | 64 | 3.1% |
|
UNIVERSITY DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 338964
|
2 | 100.0% | 65 | 3.1% |
|
AUSTIN AFL-CIO COUNCIL
Vendor ID 23104
|
2 | 100.0% | 70 | 2.9% |
|
TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK
Vendor ID 311616
|
2 | 100.0% | 68 | 2.9% |
|
LA PRENSA
Vendor ID 184192
|
2 | 100.0% | 104 | 1.9% |
|
OZARKA
Vendor ID 235069
|
2 | 100.0% | 147 | 1.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2004 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $500.00 | Consultant work |
| 02/15/2004 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $500.00 | Consultant work |
| 02/06/2004 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $500.00 | Consultant work |
| 01/09/2004 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $1,000.00 | Consultant work |
| 11/06/2003 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $4,000.00 | Consultant work |
| 10/09/2003 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $2,500.00 | Consultant work |
| 09/03/2003 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $3,500.00 | Consultant work |
| 08/19/2003 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $1,200.00 | Consultant work |
| 08/01/2003 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $1,000.00 | Consultant work |
| 08/05/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $1,200.00 | Consulting |
| 04/11/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $1,999.62 | Campaign Services |
| 03/28/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $2,082.67 | consulting fees |
| 03/13/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $1,800.00 | Consulting Fees |
| 03/13/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $948.31 | Campaign Services |
| 03/08/2002 | Barrientos, Gonzalo | $275.00 | Software and hardware supplies & office supplies for Barrientos Campaign |
| 03/05/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $1,800.00 | Campaign Services |
| 02/25/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $400.74 | Event: Printing & Postage |
| 02/25/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $362.07 | Campaign Services |
| 02/18/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $1,800.00 | Consulting Fee |
| 02/18/2002 | Flores, Maria Luisa 'Lulu' (Ms.) | $617.61 | Campaign Services |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.