Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Travis County Credit Union
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 332463 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$292,038.67
Client Filers
4
Payments
150
Activity Range
05/16/2007–09/11/2023
Largest Payment
$93,849.92
Graph: 4 connected filers · 150 payments · $292,038.67 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Travis County Credit Union
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eldridge, Chantal M. (The Honorable) | $276,380.28 | 76 | 09/11/2023 |
| 2 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $15,573.93 | 71 | 12/01/2017 |
| 3 | Meurer, W. Jeanne | $57.58 | 2 | 05/16/2007 |
| 4 | Triana, Gisela D. (The Honorable) | $26.88 | 1 | 11/17/2016 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Austin Bar Association
Vendor ID 23222
|
4 | 100.0% | 63 | 6.3% |
|
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
|
4 | 100.0% | 253 | 1.6% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
4 | 100.0% | 1,327 | 0.3% |
|
BLACK AUSTIN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 35789
|
3 | 75.0% | 44 | 6.7% |
|
CHECKMARK TYPESETTING
Vendor ID 58877
|
3 | 75.0% | 151 | 2.0% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,480 | 0.2% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,669 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
Metropolitan AME Church
Vendor ID 211045
|
2 | 50.0% | 3 | 40.0% |
|
Curras Grill
Vendor ID 80491
|
2 | 50.0% | 8 | 20.0% |
|
La Voz Newspapers
Vendor ID 184760
|
2 | 50.0% | 19 | 9.5% |
|
Cedar Door
Vendor ID 55608
|
2 | 50.0% | 22 | 8.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | expenditure repayment |
| 11/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | expenditure repayment |
| 10/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | repayment expenditure |
| 09/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | repayment expenditures |
| 08/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | repayment expenditures |
| 07/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | repayment for expenditures |
| 06/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 05/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 04/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 03/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 02/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 01/01/2017 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | Personal loan |
| 12/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
| 11/17/2016 | Triana, Gisela D. (The Honorable) | $26.88 | Checks |
| 11/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
| 10/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
| 09/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
| 08/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
| 07/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | repayment of loan from personal funds |
| 06/01/2016 | Case Jr., Carl B. (Mr.) | $369.53 | loan repayment from personal funds |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.