Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
TOM OLIVERSON CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 329667 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$183,900.00
Client Filers
49
Payments
122
Activity Range
12/09/2015–05/21/2026
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 49 connected filers · 122 payments · $183,900.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Tom Oliverson Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
38 | 77.6% | 239 | 15.2% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
38 | 77.6% | 325 | 11.3% |
|
DADE PHELAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 81860
|
36 | 73.5% | 219 | 15.5% |
|
LOIS KOLKHORST CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 194006
|
34 | 69.4% | 209 | 15.2% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
34 | 69.4% | 253 | 12.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
34 | 69.4% | 524 | 6.3% |
|
GREG BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 135267
|
33 | 67.3% | 169 | 17.8% |
|
DENNIS PAUL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88506
|
33 | 67.3% | 171 | 17.6% |
|
CHRIS TURNER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 61899
|
33 | 67.3% | 265 | 11.7% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
33 | 67.3% | 273 | 11.4% |
|
BRIAN BIRDWELL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 42130
|
32 | 65.3% | 188 | 15.6% |
|
JOHN KUEMPEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167958
|
32 | 65.3% | 220 | 13.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.