Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
TODD SMITH CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 329256 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$332,775.00
Client Filers
104
Payments
268
Activity Range
06/13/2000–09/13/2012
Largest Payment
$35,000.00
Graph: 104 connected filers · 268 payments · $332,775.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Todd Smith Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
87 | 83.7% | 325 | 25.4% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
73 | 70.2% | 295 | 22.4% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
72 | 69.2% | 213 | 29.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
71 | 68.3% | 524 | 12.7% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
68 | 65.4% | 187 | 30.5% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
68 | 65.4% | 222 | 26.4% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
68 | 65.4% | 227 | 25.9% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
68 | 65.4% | 268 | 22.4% |
|
CHUCK HOPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62632
|
67 | 64.4% | 172 | 32.1% |
|
JIM PITTS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165491
|
67 | 64.4% | 189 | 29.6% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
67 | 64.4% | 273 | 21.6% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
67 | 64.4% | 289 | 20.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2012 | Martinez Fischer III, Trey (Mr.) | $200.00 | capitol office appliance |
| 05/19/2012 | Texas Parent PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution, SD 9 |
| 05/18/2012 | Texas Radiological Society Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Political contribution to a candidate's campaign |
| 05/14/2012 | HDR Inc. PAC | $1,000.00 | Todd Smith STATE SENATE 9th TX |
| 05/11/2012 | HOSPAC-State The Political Action Committee of The Texas Hospital Association | $2,500.00 | Todd Smith STATE HOUSE 92nd TX |
| 05/08/2012 | Consulting Engineers PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 05/07/2012 | Cobb Fendley PAC | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 05/07/2012 | Cobb Fendley PAC | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 04/26/2012 | Freese and Nichols PAC | $500.00 | Support Campaign |
| 04/25/2012 | Centene Corporation Political Action Committee (Centene PAC) | $750.00 | To Support Primary 2012 State Senate 92 TX |
| 04/25/2012 | CP&Y, Inc. PAC | $250.00 | General Contribution |
| 04/19/2012 | Gulf States Toyota Inc. Texas State PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution |
| 04/09/2012 | Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee | $35,000.00 | Todd Smith STATE HOUSE 92nd TX |
| 04/05/2012 | Texas Parent PAC | $10,000.00 | campaign contribution to the Todd Smith Campaign, SD 9 |
| 04/05/2012 | Cummings PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution to Todd Smith campaign |
| 04/05/2012 | Cummings PAC | $2,000.00 | Contribution to Todd Smith Campaign |
| 03/30/2012 | Texas Construction Association PAC | $2,500.00 | SD 9 |
| 03/28/2012 | GHA Healthcare Professionals for Quality Government | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 03/13/2012 | Texas Dental Hygienists' Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 03/12/2012 | Carona Sr., John (Mr.) | $10,000.00 | Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.