Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

THOMAS PRINTING

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 326737 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$22,936.05
Client Filers
3
Payments
7
Activity Range
02/27/2004–09/19/2022
Largest Payment
$7,528.92
Graph: 3 connected filers · 7 payments · $22,936.05 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Lane, Monte (Mr.)$14,792.24203/31/2004
2Friends of Cecil Bell Jr.$7,472.66412/17/2012
3Lamb, Sarah C. (Ms.)$671.15109/19/2022

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
THOMAS PRINTING & PUBLISHING
Vendor ID 326738
2 66.7% 2 66.7%
MONTGOMERY COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 217264
2 66.7% 100 2.0%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
2 66.7% 355 0.6%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
2 66.7% 3,017 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
09/19/2022Lamb, Sarah C. (Ms.)$671.15Digital Marketin g
12/17/2012Friends of Cecil Bell Jr$243.56CECIL BELL JR 2012 CHRISTMAS CARDS
05/24/2012Friends of Cecil Bell Jr.$6,741.98CAMPAIGN DIRECT MAIL
03/31/2004Lane, Monte (Mr.)$7,528.92mailout
02/27/2004Lane, Monte (Mr.)$7,263.32mailout
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.