Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

THE PRINT SHOPPE

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 323179 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$83,739.91
Client Filers
10
Payments
46
Activity Range
09/09/2000–05/20/2025
Largest Payment
$19,116.72
Graph: 10 connected filers · 46 payments · $83,739.91 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Friends of Susan Combs Committee$43,712.872911/30/2012
2Hays County Democratic Party$30,635.35308/01/2023
3Greytok, John (Mr.)$3,229.23602/05/2016
4Friends of Barry Smitherman$1,947.42101/20/2014
5Garcia, Linda J. (The Honorable)$1,568.54105/20/2025
6Ellis, Rodney G$1,027.78202/04/2008
7Cook, David L. (The Honorable)$672.23112/30/2024
8FRITSCH, LISA$518.52101/31/2014
9Goodwin, Vikki A. (Mrs.)$243.02103/03/2017
10Patterson, Jerry E. (The Honorable)$184.95109/09/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
9 90.0% 1,077 0.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
9 90.0% 3,017 0.3%
FEDEX OFFICE
Vendor ID 111594
8 80.0% 649 1.2%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
8 80.0% 906 0.9%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
8 80.0% 1,480 0.5%
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
7 70.0% 553 1.3%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
7 70.0% 734 0.9%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
7 70.0% 1,045 0.7%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 70.0% 1,101 0.6%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
7 70.0% 1,638 0.4%
TARRANT COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 304945
6 60.0% 190 3.1%
CHICK-FIL-A
Vendor ID 60264
6 60.0% 483 1.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
05/20/2025Garcia, Linda J. (The Honorable)$1,568.54High school graduation certificates for HD107
12/30/2024Cook, David L. (The Honorable)$672.23Campaign Christmas Cards
08/01/2023Hays County Democratic Party$6,761.04Trifold Printing/Mailing Nov 2022 Election
10/17/2022Hays County Democratic Party$19,116.72Trifold Printing and Mailing
08/18/2022Hays County Democratic Party$4,757.59GOTV Doorhanger Inserts
03/03/2017Goodwin, Vikki A. (Mrs.)$243.02Campaign business cards
02/05/2016Greytok, John (Mr.)$618.43print campaign remittance envelopes
01/27/2016Greytok, John (Mr.)$518.52print campaign push cards
01/16/2016Greytok, John (Mr.)$323.67print campaign push cards
01/12/2016Greytok, John (Mr.)$89.31graphic design and print campaign business cards
11/14/2015Greytok, John (Mr.)$916.88printing campaign push cards, letterhead, & envelopes
10/29/2015Greytok, John (Mr.)$762.42printing campaign push cards, rally signs, and stickers
01/31/2014FRITSCH, LISA$518.52Printing
01/20/2014Friends of Barry Smitherman$1,947.42Campaign Materials Printing Expense
11/30/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$5,993.35Printing expense for campaign office
11/07/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$2,804.41Printing expense for campaign office
10/31/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$4,445.52Printing expense for campaign office
10/05/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$1,138.93Printing expense for campaign office
09/27/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$1,030.54Printing expense for campaign office
09/10/2012Friends of Susan Combs Committee$3,611.31Printing expense for campaign office
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.