Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
The DeBerry Group
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 318159 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$181,711.11
Client Filers
6
Payments
24
Activity Range
04/23/2012–10/13/2018
Largest Payment
$26,000.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 24 payments · $181,711.11 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- The DeBerry Group
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $62,908.68 | 9 | 10/13/2018 |
| 2 | Alamo Colleges Momentum | $52,000.00 | 2 | 04/20/2018 |
| 3 | Novak, Michael | $33,549.32 | 7 | 12/27/2014 |
| 4 | Friends of Alamo Colleges PAC | $26,600.00 | 3 | 05/31/2017 |
| 5 | Villarreal, Michael | $4,835.71 | 2 | 12/08/2014 |
| 6 | Van de Putte, Leticia (Mrs.) | $1,817.40 | 1 | 04/23/2012 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
El Mirador
Vendor ID 101147
|
4 | 66.7% | 30 | 12.5% |
|
ELECTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Vendor ID 102714
|
4 | 66.7% | 89 | 4.4% |
|
SIGN BUSTERS
Vendor ID 284258
|
4 | 66.7% | 102 | 3.8% |
|
LOS BARRIOS
Vendor ID 195407
|
3 | 50.0% | 17 | 15.0% |
|
ALLIED ADVERTISING AGENCY
Vendor ID 11814
|
3 | 50.0% | 21 | 12.5% |
|
West San Antonio Chamber of Commerce
Vendor ID 351690
|
3 | 50.0% | 22 | 12.0% |
|
LIBERTY BAR
Vendor ID 190979
|
3 | 50.0% | 29 | 9.4% |
|
LA GLORIA
Vendor ID 183546
|
3 | 50.0% | 34 | 8.1% |
|
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
Vendor ID 274466
|
3 | 50.0% | 41 | 6.8% |
|
JIM'S RESTAURANT
Vendor ID 165706
|
3 | 50.0% | 48 | 5.9% |
|
NORTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 228121
|
3 | 50.0% | 82 | 3.5% |
|
AFL-CIO
Vendor ID 8037
|
3 | 50.0% | 89 | 3.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $11,660.00 | campaign management consulting |
| 10/13/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,398.81 | campaign management consulting |
| 09/10/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,061.88 | campaign consulting |
| 07/19/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $3,000.00 | campaign consulting |
| 04/20/2018 | Alamo Colleges Momentum | $26,000.00 | Strategy |
| 04/02/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,362.82 | Primary election consulting |
| 03/05/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,134.27 | Primary election consulting |
| 02/13/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,094.67 | campaign consulting and management |
| 01/12/2018 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $7,015.76 | Campaign consultating |
| 11/19/2017 | Minjarez, Ina M. (Rep.) | $5,180.47 | Campaign consulting |
| 05/31/2017 | Friends of Alamo Colleges PAC | $600.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 05/09/2017 | Friends of Alamo Colleges PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 05/04/2017 | Friends of Alamo Colleges PAC | $25,000.00 | Campaign Consulting |
| 12/27/2014 | Novak, Michael | $2,483.52 | Campaign Services |
| 12/08/2014 | Villarreal, Michael | $2,291.83 | mayoral campaign general consultant |
| 11/13/2014 | Villarreal, Michael | $2,543.88 | mayoral campaign general consultant |
| 06/27/2014 | Novak, Michael | $5,000.00 | Campaign Services |
| 04/14/2014 | Novak, Michael | $10,000.00 | Campaign Services |
| 02/17/2014 | Novak, Michael | $1,653.84 | Campaign Services |
| 02/17/2014 | Novak, Michael | $1,540.78 | Campaign Services |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.