Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
THE COLLIER COMMITTEE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 317525 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$5,350,996.42
Client Filers
5
Payments
576
Activity Range
08/04/2013–12/14/2025
Largest Payment
$92,218.88
Graph: 5 connected filers · 576 payments · $5,350,996.42 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- The Collier Committee
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ActBlue Texas | $5,348,896.42 | 571 | 12/14/2025 |
| 2 | Stittleburg, Jason G. (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | 1 | 06/22/2022 |
| 3 | Burnet County Democratic Club | $750.00 | 2 | 07/09/2022 |
| 4 | Bucy III, John H. (The Honorable) | $250.00 | 1 | 12/31/2021 |
| 5 | Guerra, Amparo Yanez (The Honorable) | $100.00 | 1 | 09/08/2022 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
|
ROCHELLE GARZA FOR TEXAS
Vendor ID 266907
|
3 | 60.0% | 14 | 18.8% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
|
3 | 60.0% | 492 | 0.6% |
|
DWAIN HANDLEY 4 TEXAS
Vendor ID 96790
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
FRIENDS OF JESSICA TIEDT
Vendor ID 120906
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
LUIS ECHEGARAY FOR TEXAS
Vendor ID 197786
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
SARA GROFF FOR JP 2
Vendor ID 276173
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC RURAL INITIATIVE
Vendor ID 310787
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
CLAYTON TUCKER CAMPAIGN FUND
Vendor ID 66851
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
ROUND ROCK DEMOCRATS CLUB
Vendor ID 269492
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
Whitlow for Congress
Vendor ID 353527
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
ERIN FOR WILCO
Vendor ID 105979
|
2 | 40.0% | 4 | 28.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/2025 | ActBlue Texas | $581.07 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 12/07/2025 | ActBlue Texas | $1,007.55 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/30/2025 | ActBlue Texas | $2,703.03 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/15/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $3,184.88 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/08/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $4,617.44 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/06/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $54,694.22 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/03/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $17,462.38 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/02/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $9,769.59 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/01/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $20,429.38 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/31/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $17,007.08 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/30/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $48,596.06 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/27/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $33,057.45 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/26/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $16,080.31 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/25/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $26,510.83 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/24/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $27,906.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/23/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $92,218.88 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/20/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $26,525.15 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/19/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $25,085.63 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/18/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $14,236.93 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/17/2022 | ActBlue Texas | $12,658.99 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.