Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
THE 134 PAC
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 315495 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$118,712.56
Client Filers
9
Payments
300
Activity Range
02/28/2021–06/28/2026
Largest Payment
$5,390.59
Graph: 9 connected filers · 300 payments · $118,712.56 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- The 134 PAC
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ActBlue Texas | $113,422.56 | 290 | 06/28/2026 |
| 2 | Texas Organizing Project Political Action Committee | $2,000.00 | 1 | 06/04/2025 |
| 3 | Brazos County Democratic Party (CEC) | $1,685.00 | 1 | 09/08/2022 |
| 4 | Women Win PAC | $700.00 | 3 | 06/30/2022 |
| 5 | Williamson County Democratic Party PAC | $420.00 | 1 | 09/10/2022 |
| 6 | Win Texas PAC | $250.00 | 1 | 06/25/2022 |
| 7 | Jaworski, Joe S. (Mr.) | $110.00 | 1 | 05/30/2025 |
| 8 | Burnet County Democratic Club | $100.00 | 1 | 05/08/2025 |
| 9 | Ly, Francine | $25.00 | 1 | 07/07/2022 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
7 | 77.8% | 1,669 | 0.4% |
|
BETO FOR TEXAS
Vendor ID 32884
|
5 | 55.6% | 55 | 8.5% |
|
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
|
5 | 55.6% | 592 | 0.8% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,638 | 0.3% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,958 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
5 | 55.6% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
TARRANT COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 304835
|
4 | 44.4% | 140 | 2.8% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC WOMEN
Vendor ID 310805
|
4 | 44.4% | 243 | 1.6% |
|
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
|
4 | 44.4% | 578 | 0.7% |
|
WALGREENS
Vendor ID 347856
|
4 | 44.4% | 765 | 0.5% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
4 | 44.4% | 898 | 0.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $33.61 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/21/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $62.42 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/14/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $259.30 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/07/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $297.73 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/31/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/24/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $148.87 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/17/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $264.11 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/10/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $103.71 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/03/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $139.25 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/26/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $124.86 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/19/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $48.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/12/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $262.19 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/05/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $129.65 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/29/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $86.43 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $242.98 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/08/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $2,602.94 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $67.22 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $182.48 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $242.98 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.