Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

TEXAS PRINTING COMPANY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 313087 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$93,006.67
Client Filers
16
Payments
100
Activity Range
04/04/2000–10/19/2020
Largest Payment
$7,119.82
Graph: 16 connected filers · 100 payments · $93,006.67 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Party$36,051.702103/01/2010
2Texas Democratic Party$26,233.13906/18/2012
3Dawnna Dukes Campaign$11,599.603205/21/2014
4Bryan ISD Bond Backers$5,390.00410/19/2020
5Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Employee PAC$3,749.26204/01/2010
6Chisum, Warren$3,209.351808/03/2011
7Cook, John (Mr.)$2,558.21207/21/2014
8Kent, Carol H. (Ms.)$1,292.13410/06/2008
9Guzman, Sam$671.95101/26/2002
10Reyes, Rico$506.61110/27/2013
11Russ Jr., Bryan F. (Mr.)$430.84112/06/2017
12Wise, Miguel D (The Honorable)$415.68104/12/2000
13KEFFER, JAMES (Mr.)$311.76104/10/2000
14Texas Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Committee$281.45102/18/2004
15Zaffirini, Judith$184.00106/15/2011
16Clark, Ronald$121.00101/21/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
11 68.8% 3,017 0.4%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
10 62.5% 1,174 0.8%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
9 56.3% 355 2.5%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
9 56.3% 1,101 0.8%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
9 56.3% 1,077 0.8%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
9 56.3% 1,480 0.6%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
8 50.0% 906 0.9%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
8 50.0% 1,045 0.8%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
8 50.0% 1,327 0.6%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
8 50.0% 1,360 0.6%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
8 50.0% 1,368 0.6%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
8 50.0% 1,536 0.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/19/2020Bryan ISD Bond Backers$640.00Stickers for road signs
06/30/2020Bryan ISD Bond Backers$750.00Signage
05/21/2020Bryan ISD Bond Backers$1,500.00Signage
04/10/2020Bryan ISD Bond Backers$2,500.00Signage
12/06/2017Russ Jr., Bryan F. (Mr.)$430.84campaign cards
07/21/2014Cook, John (Mr.)$1,066.27Trifold brochure
05/21/2014Dawnna Dukes Campaign$308.52Texas embossed gold seals
01/17/2014Cook, John (Mr.)$1,491.94Stationary
10/27/2013Reyes, Rico$506.61Printing
04/29/2013Dawnna Dukes Campaign$450.32Texas Gold Seals
06/18/2012Texas Democratic Party$207.84Postcards for state convention delegates
05/19/2012Dawnna Dukes Campaign$362.84gold state seals for mailers
08/03/2011Chisum, Warren$201.99campaign envelopes
06/15/2011Zaffirini, Judith$184.00Stationery
04/23/2010Dawnna Dukes Campaign$541.25texas gold seals for certificates to constituents
04/01/2010Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Employee PAC$152.64Postacrd printing costs
03/01/2010Texas Democratic Party$7,119.82convention printing
02/11/2010Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Employee PAC$3,596.62Printing and postage for political flyer
02/05/2010Texas Democratic Party$7,098.14convention materials printing
12/30/2009Chisum, Warren$678.57stationery & banners
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.