Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 312872 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$3,510,993.19
Client Filers
62
Payments
377
Activity Range
02/16/2010–02/27/2026
Largest Payment
$275,690.24
Graph: 62 connected filers · 377 payments · $3,510,993.19 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Texas Organizing Project
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
50 | 80.6% | 1,669 | 3.0% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
46 | 74.2% | 3,017 | 1.5% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
41 | 66.1% | 1,077 | 3.7% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
38 | 61.3% | 1,638 | 2.3% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
37 | 59.7% | 1,174 | 3.1% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
36 | 58.1% | 1,480 | 2.4% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
36 | 58.1% | 1,876 | 1.9% |
|
JASON'S DELI
Vendor ID 162552
|
35 | 56.5% | 649 | 5.2% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
35 | 56.5% | 1,101 | 3.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
34 | 54.8% | 1,958 | 1.7% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
33 | 53.2% | 785 | 4.1% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
31 | 50.0% | 906 | 3.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.