Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

TEXAS NATIONAL BANK

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Financial Services
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 312774 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,144,286.73
Client Filers
13
Payments
421
Activity Range
08/30/2001–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$180,475.62
Graph: 13 connected filers · 421 payments · $1,144,286.73 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$655,283.0327706/05/2026
2Esquivel, Orlando J. (Mr.)$182,926.191206/03/2024
3Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$157,065.907901/30/2026
4Contreras, Jesus (Mr.)$104,400.00401/31/2012
5Pruneda, Miguel Angel (Mr.)$38,469.222106/01/2013
6Delgado, Rodolfo (Judge)$5,000.00102/23/2008
7Texans for Chris Paddie$600.00112/10/2020
8Rodriguez-Betancourt, Renee (The Honorable)$279.04406/15/2026
9Citizens for People First Political Action Committee$125.45503/09/2020
10Big O PAC$92.901310/29/2020
11Durrett, Kenneth (Mr.)$30.00209/21/2001
12Morrow, Samantha E. (Mrs.)$10.00101/31/2024
13Cabrera-Huff, Celeste (Mrs.)$5.00106/30/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
BRAND BOOSTERS
Vendor ID 40713
6 46.2% 49 10.7%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
6 46.2% 1,480 0.4%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
6 46.2% 1,876 0.3%
HIDALGO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 144897
5 38.5% 32 12.5%
THE MONITOR
Vendor ID 322014
5 38.5% 86 5.3%
HIDALGO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 144917
5 38.5% 94 4.9%
ACADEMY
Vendor ID 5378
5 38.5% 251 1.9%
STATE BAR OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 295203
5 38.5% 418 1.2%
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
5 38.5% 578 0.9%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
5 38.5% 1,101 0.5%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
5 38.5% 1,174 0.4%
CITY OF DONNA
Vendor ID 65304
4 30.8% 13 18.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026Cabrera-Huff, Celeste (Mrs.)$5.00Bank Fees
06/15/2026Rodriguez-Betancourt, Renee (The Honorable)$100.63BANK FEES
06/05/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$93.41Banking
05/22/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$186.58banking
05/01/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$96.52Banking
04/24/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$192.78banking
04/03/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$87.19banking
03/20/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$174.14banking
03/13/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$207.50event flowers
03/09/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$96.52bank fees
02/20/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$192.80banking
01/30/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$96.53banking
01/30/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$5.00electronic bank fees
01/30/2026Singleterry, Luis Manuel (The Honorable)$5.00 Statement fee
01/23/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$192.80banking
01/12/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$30,162.24loan payment
01/05/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$250.00Bank fees
01/02/2026Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$93.41Banking
12/19/2025Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$186.58Banking
12/12/2025Lopez-Singleterry, Nereida (The Honorable)$139.07Banking
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.