Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
TEXANS FOR LAMAR SMITH
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 308767 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$344,730.00
Client Filers
55
Payments
244
Activity Range
04/12/2000–10/29/2018
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 55 connected filers · 244 payments · $344,730.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Texans for Lamar Smith
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
37 | 67.3% | 386 | 9.2% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
35 | 63.6% | 524 | 6.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
31 | 56.4% | 297 | 9.7% |
|
BRADY FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 40578
|
30 | 54.5% | 66 | 33.0% |
|
DAVID DEWHURST COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 85094
|
30 | 54.5% | 236 | 11.5% |
|
CULBERSON FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 80208
|
29 | 52.7% | 61 | 33.3% |
|
KAY GRANGER CAMPAIGN FUND
Vendor ID 175234
|
28 | 50.9% | 54 | 34.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR HENRY BONILLA
Vendor ID 308650
|
27 | 49.1% | 39 | 40.3% |
|
MICHAEL BURGESS FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 211899
|
27 | 49.1% | 52 | 33.8% |
|
PETE SESSIONS FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 242675
|
27 | 49.1% | 64 | 29.3% |
|
TEXANS FOR SENATOR JOHN CORNYN
Vendor ID 308866
|
27 | 49.1% | 73 | 26.7% |
|
MCCAUL FOR CONGRESS
Vendor ID 207560
|
26 | 47.3% | 47 | 34.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2018 | San Antonio Police Officers Assn. PAC | $2,500.00 | STATE REP SUPPORT |
| 09/25/2017 | NuStarpac | $5,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 08/24/2017 | Valero Energy Corporation PAC | $10,000.00 | Lamar Smith - Federal - Support |
| 08/24/2017 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund For Effective Government | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
| 07/10/2017 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,000.00 | Primary |
| 02/06/2017 | The Continuum Fund, Zachry Holdings, Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE |
| 09/23/2016 | Texas Farm Bureau Friends Of Agriculture Fund Inc. | $2,300.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 09/06/2016 | Government Personnel Mutual Life Insurance PAC | $100.00 | PAC contribution to U.S. Congressman |
| 08/29/2016 | Valero Energy Corporation PAC | $1,000.00 | Lamar Smith - Federal - Support |
| 08/22/2016 | Texas Farm Bureau Friends Of Agriculture Fund Inc. | $2,500.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 08/16/2016 | San Antonio Police Officers Assn. PAC | $1,000.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION - STATE |
| 06/10/2016 | Hanger, Inc. | $1,000.00 | Contribution |
| 05/20/2016 | NuStarpac | $5,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 03/22/2016 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 02/12/2016 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund For Effective Government | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
| 01/27/2016 | Texas Farm Bureau Friends Of Agriculture Fund Inc. | $4,800.00 | FEDERAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 01/21/2016 | Valero Energy Corporation PAC | $2,500.00 | Lamar Smith - Federal - Support |
| 01/18/2016 | Zachry Construction Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/04/2015 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Committee |
| 11/19/2015 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund For Effective Government | $2,000.00 | Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.