Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

TX ETHICS COMMISSION

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 335803 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,703.77
Client Filers
17
Payments
26
Activity Range
07/22/2002–09/09/2025
Largest Payment
$500.00
Graph: 17 connected filers · 26 payments · $7,703.77 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Rodriguez, Eduardo$2,000.00403/20/2006
2Fraser for Texas Senate$1,000.00211/18/2004
3Parrott, Lois (Mrs.)$1,000.00203/05/2014
4New Braunfels Police Officers Association PAC$500.00101/09/2017
5Castro, Frank J. (The Honorable)$500.00109/09/2025
6McGill, Lorena Perez (Ms.)$500.00107/01/2020
7Keeping LISD Strong$500.00105/01/2023
8White, William H.$327.50302/25/2010
9Goodman, Toby$250.00103/23/2004
10HANSCHEN, DAVID (Mr.)$250.00107/23/2010
11Tony Sanchez for Governor Inc. formerly Sanchez Exploratory Committee$243.35208/12/2002
12Nelson, Jane$243.20207/09/2003
13Texas Association of REALTORS Political Action Committee$153.63101/09/2019
14Marchant, Kenny$100.00102/28/2003
15Texas Democratic Women of Central Texas PAC$100.00110/19/2023
16Ramsay, Thomas D (The Honorable)$33.60110/11/2002
17Lockhart For Tomorrow PAC$2.49105/22/2025

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
11 64.7% 3,017 0.4%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
10 58.8% 1,445 0.7%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
9 52.9% 1,045 0.9%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
9 52.9% 1,174 0.8%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
9 52.9% 1,368 0.7%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
9 52.9% 1,536 0.6%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
9 52.9% 1,958 0.5%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
8 47.1% 677 1.2%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
8 47.1% 946 0.8%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
8 47.1% 1,077 0.7%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
8 47.1% 1,360 0.6%
U-HAUL
Vendor ID 336597
7 41.2% 159 4.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
09/09/2025Castro, Frank J. (The Honorable)$500.00FEES
10/19/2023Texas Democratic Women of Central Texas PAC$100.00Fees & Charges:Late Fee
05/01/2023Keeping LISD Strong$500.00Fee for 30 day pre-election report being late.
07/01/2020McGill, Lorena Perez (Ms.)$500.00NonCompliance Fee
01/09/2019Texas Association of REALTORS Political Action Committee$153.63Annual Lobby Registration
01/09/2017New Braunfels Police Officers Association PAC$500.00Ethics Commission Fee-Late Report
03/05/2014Parrott, Lois (Mrs.)$500.00I was unaware of a form but I did turn it in later and the fee was waived
03/05/2014Parrott, Lois (Mrs.)$500.00I was unaware of a form but I did turn it in later and the fee was waived
07/23/2010HANSCHEN, DAVID (Mr.)$250.00Fine for filing late by 16 Minutes
02/25/2010White, William H.$93.80Research
01/19/2010White, William H.$139.90Research
03/20/2006Rodriguez, Eduardo$500.00late fee for report
03/20/2006Rodriguez, Eduardo$500.00late fee for report
03/13/2006Rodriguez, Eduardo$500.00late fee for report
03/13/2006Rodriguez, Eduardo$500.00late fee for report
11/18/2004Fraser for Texas Senate$500.00Late fee
11/18/2004Fraser for Texas Senate$500.00Late fee
03/23/2004Goodman, Toby$250.00Late fee
07/09/2003Nelson, Jane$121.60Desc:records
02/28/2003Marchant, Kenny$100.00Late filing fee
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.