Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
STATLER & COMPANY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 295728 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$124,617.94
Client Filers
6
Payments
78
Activity Range
01/29/2000–03/23/2006
Largest Payment
$19,362.51
Graph: 6 connected filers · 78 payments · $124,617.94 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Statler & Company
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunter, Robert D. (The Honorable) | $108,445.69 | 66 | 03/23/2006 |
| 2 | KEFFER, JAMES (Mr.) | $8,814.98 | 4 | 01/19/2005 |
| 3 | Hagler, Brooks (Mr.) | $3,338.67 | 3 | 01/12/2006 |
| 4 | Friends of Michael Williams | $1,908.17 | 1 | 06/27/2002 |
| 5 | Texans For Justice Rodriguez | $1,220.92 | 1 | 06/30/2002 |
| 6 | Friends of Bob Hunter | $889.51 | 3 | 05/16/2001 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
5 | 83.3% | 1,571 | 0.3% |
|
ALPHAGRAPHICS
Vendor ID 12748
|
4 | 66.7% | 180 | 2.2% |
|
CINGULAR WIRELESS
Vendor ID 63311
|
4 | 66.7% | 225 | 1.8% |
|
CAPITOL GRILL
Vendor ID 51404
|
4 | 66.7% | 277 | 1.4% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
4 | 66.7% | 906 | 0.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
4 | 66.7% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
4 | 66.7% | 1,174 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
4 | 66.7% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
ABILENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 4976
|
3 | 50.0% | 14 | 17.6% |
|
POK-E-JO'S
Vendor ID 246624
|
3 | 50.0% | 37 | 7.5% |
|
IHOP
Vendor ID 155471
|
3 | 50.0% | 254 | 1.2% |
|
FOUR SEASONS HOTEL
Vendor ID 117210
|
3 | 50.0% | 263 | 1.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2006 | Hunter, Robert D. | $400.00 | Monthly retainer (Jan & Feb) |
| 01/12/2006 | Hagler, Brooks (Mr.) | $2,781.27 | Fundraising Letters Campaign Services |
| 12/29/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $18,019.49 | Monthly retainer (Aug-Dec) and fund raiser expenses |
| 08/17/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $538.55 | Monthly retainer-fund raisers |
| 06/30/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $336.36 | Monthly retainer-fund raisers |
| 06/30/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $336.36 | Monthly retainer-fund raisers |
| 06/06/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $201.32 | Monthly retainer-fund raisers |
| 06/06/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $201.32 | Monthly retainer-fund raisers |
| 04/20/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $204.55 | Monthly retainer & expenses |
| 04/20/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $204.55 | Monthly retainer & expenses |
| 04/06/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $348.94 | Monthly expense and ad |
| 04/06/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $348.94 | Monthly expense and ad |
| 02/27/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $200.21 | Monthly retainer/expense |
| 02/27/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $200.21 | Monthly retainer/expense |
| 01/19/2005 | KEFFER, JAMES | $2,615.22 | reimbursement and fundraising |
| 01/11/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $2,532.62 | Mail out expense |
| 01/11/2005 | Hunter, Robert D. | $2,532.62 | Mail out expense |
| 12/31/2004 | Hagler, Brooks (Mr.) | $397.38 | Printing |
| 12/30/2004 | Hunter, Robert D. | $1,555.22 | Retainer/Fundraising expense |
| 12/14/2004 | Hunter, Robert D. | $203.21 | Retainer and expense |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.