Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
STAN GERDES FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 293992 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$125,250.00
Client Filers
41
Payments
89
Activity Range
01/14/2022–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 41 connected filers · 89 payments · $125,250.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Stan Gerdes for State Representative
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR TRENT ASHBY
Vendor ID 308916
|
37 | 90.2% | 190 | 19.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
37 | 90.2% | 524 | 7.0% |
|
JEFF LEACH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 163617
|
36 | 87.8% | 198 | 17.7% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
36 | 87.8% | 239 | 14.8% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
36 | 87.8% | 289 | 12.2% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
36 | 87.8% | 325 | 10.9% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
35 | 85.4% | 273 | 12.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
35 | 85.4% | 359 | 9.6% |
|
CHARLES PERRY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58084
|
34 | 82.9% | 226 | 14.6% |
|
WILL METCALF CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 354293
|
33 | 80.5% | 167 | 18.9% |
|
FRIENDS OF BRANDON CREIGHTON
Vendor ID 119895
|
33 | 80.5% | 229 | 13.9% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
33 | 80.5% | 325 | 9.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2026 | Texas Pacific Land Corporation Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/19/2026 | AFSCME Texas Correctional Officers PAC | $5,000.00 | Contribution |
| 02/18/2026 | AT&T Inc. Texas Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Stan Gerdes, STATE HOUSE 17th TX |
| 02/11/2026 | Hochheim Prairie Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/10/2026 | Texas Nurse Practitioners PAC | $1,000.00 | primary campaign contribution |
| 02/09/2026 | Consulting Engineers PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 02/06/2026 | Texas Bankers Association Bankers PAC | $1,500.00 | Contribution to non-federal candidate |
| 02/05/2026 | Delisi Communications PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 01/23/2026 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 01/22/2026 | Charter Schools Now PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 01/21/2026 | Greenberg Traurig, P. A. PAC | $750.00 | Stan Gerdes, STATE HOUSE TX-Political Contribution |
| 01/13/2026 | Texas Consumer Lenders PAC | $2,000.00 | Political contribution |
| 12/18/2025 | Texas Oil and Gas Association Good Government Committee | $5,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/15/2025 | Consulting Engineers PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/12/2025 | Cattle Raisers State PAC | $5,000.00 | Support for Texas House |
| 11/19/2025 | RS&H Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Contribution to Stan Gerdes campaign, TX State Rep, District 17 |
| 11/17/2025 | Associated Builders & Contractors of Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/13/2025 | Texas Dairymen PAC | $2,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 11/07/2025 | Westwood Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Political contribution |
| 11/06/2025 | Cobb Fendley PAC | $500.00 | State Representative, District 17 - Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.