Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

SPRING BRANCH DEMOCRATS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 291712 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$30,240.38
Client Filers
40
Payments
255
Activity Range
09/17/2007–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$4,967.37
Graph: 40 connected filers · 255 payments · $30,240.38 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$19,302.0117806/30/2026
2Southwest Democrats$4,967.37108/06/2021
3Whitmire, John (The Honorable)$1,260.001002/23/2023
4Ramos, Dion (Mr.)$600.00312/15/2009
5Berg, Janice L. (The Honorable)$500.00110/20/2025
6Garrison, Tanya N. (The Honorable)$425.00310/21/2025
7Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable)$320.00312/07/2021
8Weems, Jeff (Mr.)$300.00301/13/2010
9Sandill, Ravi K. (The Honorable)$250.00107/08/2021
10Blue Wave Alliance$220.00102/22/2019
11Roth, Donna (The Honorable)$200.00411/15/2021
12Harris County Democratic Party (CEC)$200.00204/07/2020
13Cloud, Carvana (Ms.)$200.00110/25/2024
14Martin, Amy (The Honorable)$190.00312/07/2021
15Calzada, Paul A. (Mr.)$150.00309/30/2021
16Thomas, Cheri C. (Ms.)$105.00207/29/2022
17Farrar, Jessica$100.00112/01/2009
18Lacayo, Danilo (The Honorable)$100.00110/19/2025
19Spain Jr., Charles A. (The Honorable)$80.00401/04/2024
20Miller, Beau A. (The Honorable)$80.00406/01/2025

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
38 95.0% 492 7.7%
HARRIS COUNTY TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 140583
29 72.5% 157 17.3%
HOUSTON BLACK AMERICAN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 151365
28 70.0% 177 14.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
26 65.0% 3,017 0.9%
SOUTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 289825
25 62.5% 75 27.8%
AREA 5 DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 19567
25 62.5% 125 17.9%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
23 57.5% 1,669 1.4%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
22 55.0% 785 2.7%
HOUSTON GLBT POLITICAL CAUCUS
Vendor ID 151725
21 52.5% 78 21.6%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
20 50.0% 1,480 1.3%
BAYOU BLUE DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 29385
19 47.5% 40 31.1%
HOUSTON BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 151295
19 47.5% 182 9.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$28.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$38.42POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$38.42POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$28.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/26/2026ActBlue Texas$38.42POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$28.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/29/2026ActBlue Texas$38.42POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$28.81POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$19.21POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$67.23POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/08/2026ActBlue Texas$86.44POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/01/2026ActBlue Texas$480.22POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/25/2026ActBlue Texas$288.12POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/18/2026ActBlue Texas$76.84POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/11/2026ActBlue Texas$268.91POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/04/2026ActBlue Texas$19.21POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/31/2025ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.