Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
SMITH COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 286416 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$46,411.55
Client Filers
8
Payments
321
Activity Range
09/08/2000–06/28/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 8 connected filers · 321 payments · $46,411.55 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Smith County Democratic Party
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ActBlue Texas | $29,274.34 | 293 | 06/28/2026 |
| 2 | Texas Democratic Party | $11,040.00 | 8 | 11/02/2000 |
| 3 | Battleground Texas | $2,200.00 | 10 | 11/12/2014 |
| 4 | Texas Democratic Party | $1,538.87 | 1 | 08/31/2004 |
| 5 | Grace, Cody J. (Mr.) | $1,515.00 | 3 | 12/19/2023 |
| 6 | Democratic Club of Smith County | $700.00 | 2 | 06/15/2024 |
| 7 | White, William H. | $110.00 | 3 | 11/15/2010 |
| 8 | Back to Basics PAC | $33.34 | 1 | 10/05/2010 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCLENNAN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 208602
|
5 | 62.5% | 19 | 22.7% |
|
NUECES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 228802
|
5 | 62.5% | 58 | 8.2% |
|
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
|
5 | 62.5% | 253 | 2.0% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
|
5 | 62.5% | 492 | 1.0% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,101 | 0.5% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,077 | 0.5% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,045 | 0.5% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,327 | 0.4% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,368 | 0.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,536 | 0.3% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $240.06 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/21/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $135.64 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/14/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $48.02 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/07/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $4.80 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/31/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $264.08 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/24/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $53.07 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/17/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/10/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $28.81 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/03/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $211.27 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/26/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $110.42 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/19/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $19.46 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/12/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $28.81 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/05/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/31/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $48.02 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/29/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $220.85 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $38.67 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $28.81 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/08/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $345.77 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $268.87 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.26 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.