Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Sam's Club #4742

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 273590 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$306.37
Client Filers
2
Payments
5
Activity Range
09/30/2002–02/14/2018
Largest Payment
$203.45
Graph: 2 connected filers · 5 payments · $306.37 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Surber, Cheryl (Ms.)$249.85202/14/2018
2King, Phillip S.$56.52311/03/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
PARKER COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 238129
2 100.0% 38 5.3%
CONOCO
Vendor ID 73548
2 100.0% 59 3.4%
CHICK-FIL-A
Vendor ID 60264
2 100.0% 483 0.4%
THE HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 320070
2 100.0% 585 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/14/2018Surber, Cheryl (Ms.)$46.40Batteries & Paper
02/11/2018Surber, Cheryl (Ms.)$203.45Printer Ink & Supplies
11/03/2002King, Phillip S.$21.51Desc:Travel Expense
10/04/2002King, Phillip S.$24.02Desc:Travel Expense
09/30/2002King, Phillip S.$10.99Desc:Travel Expense
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.