Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

SHEIN

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 281548 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,750.64
Client Filers
6
Payments
28
Activity Range
12/14/2023–06/15/2026
Largest Payment
$186.83
Graph: 6 connected filers · 28 payments · $1,750.64 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Great State Republicans$1,054.902012/07/2025
2Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee$292.80212/14/2023
3Val Verde County Republican Women$186.83101/02/2024
4Rockwall Republican Executive Committee General Purpose PAC (CEC)$86.38207/14/2025
5Run Sister Run Political Action Committee$72.90201/16/2026
6Rowlett Area Republican Women$56.83106/15/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
6 100.0% 1,174 0.5%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
4 66.7% 785 0.5%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
4 66.7% 898 0.4%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
4 66.7% 946 0.4%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
4 66.7% 1,480 0.3%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
4 66.7% 1,174 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
4 66.7% 1,958 0.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
4 66.7% 1,876 0.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
4 66.7% 3,017 0.1%
GRAND HYATT
Vendor ID 132838
3 50.0% 107 2.7%
ADOBE
Vendor ID 7094
3 50.0% 137 2.1%
TFRW
Vendor ID 315057
3 50.0% 259 1.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/15/2026Rowlett Area Republican Women$56.83Table Runners for Club -12
01/16/2026Run Sister Run Political Action Committee$23.61Advertising
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$42.14Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$42.14Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$42.14Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$42.14Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$42.14Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$25.97Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$25.97Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$25.97Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$25.97Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$25.97Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$21.93Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$21.93Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$21.93Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$21.93Party Supplies
12/07/2025Great State Republicans$21.93Party Supplies
12/03/2025Run Sister Run Political Action Committee$49.29Advertising
07/27/2025Great State Republicans$120.94Party Supplies
07/27/2025Great State Republicans$120.94Party Supplies
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.