Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Run the World Digital

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 270914 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$172,986.62
Client Filers
6
Payments
67
Activity Range
05/02/2018–03/18/2021
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 67 payments · $172,986.62 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Annie's List$72,051.003103/18/2021
2Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$45,251.621810/19/2020
3Turner, Christopher G. (The Honorable)$30,660.001212/04/2018
4TOP Political Action Committee$15,000.00311/06/2018
5Battleground Texas$9,000.00211/02/2018
6Beckley, Michelle J. (Ms.)$1,024.00107/27/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
6 100.0% 1,669 0.4%
NGP VAN
Vendor ID 225757
5 83.3% 252 2.0%
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
5 83.3% 553 0.9%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
5 83.3% 592 0.8%
STARBUCKS
Vendor ID 294631
5 83.3% 690 0.7%
WALGREENS
Vendor ID 347856
5 83.3% 765 0.7%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
5 83.3% 898 0.6%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
5 83.3% 1,077 0.5%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
5 83.3% 1,174 0.4%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
5 83.3% 1,638 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
5 83.3% 1,958 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 83.3% 3,017 0.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/18/2021Annie's List$3,000.00Digital fundraising consulting
02/12/2021Annie's List$3,000.00Digital fundraising consulting
12/21/2020Annie's List$3,000.00Digital consulting
12/02/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
11/05/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
10/19/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$2,000.00Consulting services
10/08/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$4,000.00Consulting services
10/05/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
10/05/2020Annie's List$250.00Digital consulting
09/09/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$4,000.00Campaign digital services
09/09/2020Annie's List$200.00Digital consulting
09/01/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
09/01/2020Annie's List$216.00Digital consulting
08/11/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
08/10/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$215.62Campaign digital services
08/06/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$4,000.00Campaign digital services
07/28/2020Castaneda, Chrysta (Ms.)$4,000.00Campaign digital services
07/27/2020Beckley, Michelle J. (Ms.)$1,024.00Email Consulting
07/13/2020Annie's List$2,500.00Digital consulting
06/25/2020Annie's List$500.00Digital consulting
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.