Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

R&R Printing & Graphics

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 253592 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,193.67
Client Filers
3
Payments
4
Activity Range
03/27/2006–04/16/2025
Largest Payment
$1,450.00
Graph: 3 connected filers · 4 payments · $2,193.67 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ECISD Bond PAC$2,045.00204/16/2025
2Wharton County Republican Party$75.60103/27/2006
3Hardin, Ben (The Honorable)$73.07101/21/2020

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
WHARTON JOURNAL SPECTATOR
Vendor ID 352711
2 66.7% 12 15.4%
HARLAND CHECKS
Vendor ID 139644
2 66.7% 36 5.4%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
2 66.7% 906 0.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
04/16/2025ECISD Bond PAC$595.0050 Yard Signs
04/10/2025ECISD Bond PAC$1,450.00110 Yard Signs
01/21/2020Hardin, Ben (The Honorable)$73.07Flyers
03/27/2006Wharton County Republican Party$75.60Printing & stapling 30 sets of resolutions for county convention
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.