Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

QBall Design

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 252221 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$62,873.62
Client Filers
15
Payments
76
Activity Range
11/05/2005–02/15/2022
Largest Payment
$11,366.28
Graph: 15 connected filers · 76 payments · $62,873.62 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Pruitt, James (Mr.)$24,646.671405/18/2012
2Willeford, David K. (Mr.)$7,143.261007/16/2012
3Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$6,701.74802/19/2016
4Northcutt, Ralph (Mr.)$4,811.18708/15/2012
5Holland, Justin A. (The Honorable)$4,384.13502/15/2022
6McCallum, Tim (Mr.)$4,065.11903/03/2006
7Bench, James Andrew (Mr.)$2,533.08302/04/2014
8Hollingsworth, Kirby (Mr.)$1,894.38511/02/2006
9Better Schools. Brighter Future.$1,730.00110/16/2015
10Cain, Erwin (Mr.)$1,427.87302/05/2008
11Liechty For Texas$1,277.35308/23/2015
12Lilley, Steven B. (Mr.)$872.27202/23/2012
13Rockwall County Republican Men's Club$614.32409/08/2015
14Rakow, David (Mr.)$447.51112/31/2012
15Latham, Thomas R. (Mr.)$324.75111/21/2009

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
7 46.7% 1,327 0.5%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
7 46.7% 1,571 0.4%
DESIGNER GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 89244
5 33.3% 316 1.5%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
5 33.3% 946 0.5%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
5 33.3% 1,045 0.5%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
5 33.3% 1,536 0.3%
KSST Radio
Vendor ID 181882
4 26.7% 9 20.0%
COOPER REVIEW
Vendor ID 74590
4 26.7% 16 14.8%
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
4 26.7% 696 0.6%
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
4 26.7% 734 0.5%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
4 26.7% 1,368 0.3%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
4 26.7% 1,445 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/15/2022Holland, Justin A. (The Honorable)$460.06Campaign Digital Ads Design Consulting
02/14/2022Holland, Justin A. (The Honorable)$378.88Campaign Digital Ads Design Consulting
01/10/2022Holland, Justin A. (The Honorable)$2,706.25Campaign Digital Ad Design
02/19/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$457.36Artwork for Ads
02/18/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$528.86Artwork design for ads
02/08/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$1,423.44Design and printing for additional mailers
02/08/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$1,423.44Design and printing for additional mailers
01/27/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$1,293.59Design Services
01/27/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$1,293.59Design Services
01/27/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$140.73Design Services
01/27/2016Council, Daniel S. (Mr.)$140.73Design Services
10/16/2015Better Schools. Brighter Future.$1,730.00Mailer Concept & Design
09/08/2015Rockwall County Republican Men's Club$140.732015 Golf Tourney Printing
08/23/2015Liechty For Texas$324.75Print and Production of Ads
07/22/2015Liechty For Texas$860.59Graphics Services
07/22/2015Liechty For Texas$92.01Campaign Stationary
02/04/2014Bench, James Andrew (Mr.)$844.36Ad Design
12/31/2012Rakow, David (Mr.)$447.51Magnetic signs for parades
09/08/2012Rockwall County Republican Men's Club$135.31Golf Tournament
08/15/2012Northcutt, Ralph (Mr.)$1,495.35Push card design and printing; billboard design; bumper sticker design
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.