Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

PrintORama

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 250329 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$5,020.22
Client Filers
4
Payments
7
Activity Range
09/07/2012–03/11/2014
Largest Payment
$1,250.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 7 payments · $5,020.22 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Olmos, Dorothy M. (Ms.)$2,500.00201/15/2013
2Carmona, Christopher (Mr.)$1,529.34203/11/2014
3Martinez, Joaquin (Mr.)$633.66101/22/2013
4Nha Ai Quoc Foundation$357.22209/07/2012

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
2 50.0% 3,017 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/11/2014Carmona, Christopher (Mr.)$1,185.34Marketing Material
03/03/2014Carmona, Christopher (Mr.)$344.00Marketing material
01/22/2013Martinez, Joaquin (Mr.)$633.66Mailer
01/15/2013Olmos, Dorothy M. (Ms.)$1,250.00Signs
01/15/2013Olmos, Dorothy M. (Ms.)$1,250.00Signs
09/07/2012Nha Ai Quoc Foundation$178.61Yard Signs
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.