Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Precision Graphics Centers

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 248810 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$8,635.65
Client Filers
5
Payments
44
Activity Range
01/18/2006–10/01/2018
Largest Payment
$1,243.99
Graph: 5 connected filers · 44 payments · $8,635.65 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1University of Houston Political Action Committee$4,190.49405/14/2015
2Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$3,379.152711/03/2011
3Baker, Caroline E.$532.41108/31/2010
4Conservative Coalition of Harris County$402.781110/01/2018
5Greater Houston Pachyderm Club$130.82101/18/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
3 60.0% 457 0.7%
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
3 60.0% 947 0.3%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
3 60.0% 1,958 0.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
3 60.0% 3,017 0.1%
AT Conference
Vendor ID 21806
2 40.0% 3 33.3%
RIVER OAKS COUNTRY CLUB
Vendor ID 265263
2 40.0% 31 5.9%
RAPID DELIVERY SERVICE
Vendor ID 255787
2 40.0% 45 4.2%
ALLEN FLETCHER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 11568
2 40.0% 76 2.5%
JOE CRABB CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 166647
2 40.0% 78 2.5%
DAUGHTERS OF LIBERTY
Vendor ID 84681
2 40.0% 79 2.4%
VILLAGE REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 345160
2 40.0% 83 2.3%
DEBBIE RIDDLE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 86657
2 40.0% 86 2.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/01/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$16.70Copies of candidate questionnaires for panel members
09/28/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$27.63Copies of candidate questionnaires for panel members
04/02/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$33.86Copies of candidate questionnaires for panel members
01/29/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$24.29Copies of Candidate Questionnaires for panel members
01/22/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$36.47Copies of Candidate Questionnaires
01/12/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$52.65Copies of Candidate Questionnaires
01/04/2018Conservative Coalition of Harris County$42.41Copies of Candidate Questionnaires
10/02/2017Conservative Coalition of Harris County$60.21Copies of Candidate's Questionnaires for CCHC Panel Members to review
02/29/2016Conservative Coalition of Harris County$30.21Copies of Candidate Questionnaires
01/11/2016Conservative Coalition of Harris County$32.83Copies of Candidate's Questionnaire for Panel Members
01/04/2016Conservative Coalition of Harris County$45.52Copies of Candidate's Questionnaire for Panel Members
05/14/2015University of Houston Political Action Committee$983.07Fundraising event invitations
04/02/2014University of Houston Political Action Committee$980.36May 19th Invitations
05/14/2013University of Houston Political Action Committee$1,243.99May 22nd Reception Invitations
11/03/2011Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$138.58newsletter
10/09/2011Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$131.97newsletter
09/15/2011Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$131.92newsletter
08/07/2011Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$129.78newsletter
08/31/2010Baker, Caroline E.$532.41Promotional Items
02/26/2010Texas Tea Party Republican Women PAC$217.76monthly newsletter
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.