Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
PETE LANEY CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 242638 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$258,550.00
Client Filers
55
Payments
91
Activity Range
04/25/2000–12/08/2004
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 55 connected filers · 91 payments · $258,550.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Pete Laney Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
46 | 83.6% | 386 | 11.6% |
|
KIP AVERITT CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 179368
|
39 | 70.9% | 138 | 25.3% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
37 | 67.3% | 230 | 14.9% |
|
MIKE JACKSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213615
|
35 | 63.6% | 162 | 19.2% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
35 | 63.6% | 325 | 10.1% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
34 | 61.8% | 213 | 14.5% |
|
BRIAN MCCALL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 42226
|
33 | 60.0% | 123 | 22.8% |
|
STEVE OGDEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 296724
|
33 | 60.0% | 126 | 22.3% |
|
KIM BRIMER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 178417
|
32 | 58.2% | 150 | 18.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
32 | 58.2% | 524 | 5.9% |
|
EDMUND KUEMPEL CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 99769
|
31 | 56.4% | 106 | 23.8% |
|
DAVID DEWHURST COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 85094
|
31 | 56.4% | 236 | 11.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/08/2004 | Licensed Beverage Distributors PAC | $500.00 | contribution |
| 12/01/2004 | Trinity Industries Employee Political Action Committee (SF) Inc. | $300.00 | 2004 General Election Contribution |
| 11/23/2004 | Texas Land Title Association PAC | $250.00 | contribution |
| 11/15/2004 | Security Service Federal Credit Union Political Action Committee | $250.00 | Support |
| 11/09/2004 | TXPAC | $1,000.00 | Pete Laney Campaign |
| 11/09/2004 | TXPAC | $1,000.00 | Pete Laney Campaign |
| 11/09/2004 | Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Non-Federal Contribution: James E. Laney (TX-85-D) |
| 10/18/2004 | Texas Society of CPAs-PAC | $500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 10/12/2004 | Texas Wildlife Association PAC | $250.00 | Political Contribution |
| 10/07/2004 | LUMPAC -- Lumbermen's Association of Texas Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/29/2004 | Texas Federation of Teachers Committee on Political Education | $1,000.00 | Officeholder/campaign support |
| 09/21/2004 | Anadarko Petroleum Corp. PAC | $500.00 | State House 85 TX |
| 09/08/2004 | Houston Pilots PAC Fund | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 08/17/2004 | ChevronTexaco Employees Texas PAC (CTETXPAC) | $500.00 | James Laney STATE HOUSE 85th TX |
| 08/09/2004 | Texas Apartment Association PAC | $1,000.00 | contribution |
| 02/23/2004 | Telford, Barry (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | onation |
| 10/30/2002 | Dynegy Texas Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Contribution TX85D |
| 10/15/2002 | LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY PAC | $500.00 | CONTRIBUTION TO POLITICAL COMMITTEE |
| 10/09/2002 | Texas Chemical Council/Assn. Of Chemical Industry Of Texas Free Enterprise Political Action Committe | $1,000.00 | PAC Contribution |
| 10/07/2002 | Constructive Citizenship Program of Texas Instruments | $750.00 | Political contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.