Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

People Newspapers

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 241769 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$118,827.59
Client Filers
11
Payments
47
Activity Range
02/26/2000–04/02/2026
Largest Payment
$12,018.00
Graph: 11 connected filers · 47 payments · $118,827.59 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texans for Dan Branch$34,779.101207/09/2012
2Highland Park Community League$22,180.00204/02/2026
3Branch, Dan$19,951.60909/06/2007
4Harris, Frances$18,034.00210/27/2006
5University Park Community League$9,945.961604/01/2018
6Westcott, Chart (Mr.)$6,600.00102/05/2014
7Scots 4 Scots PAC$2,445.00109/27/2024
8Ray, Farrell$1,738.00111/01/2001
9Anchia, Rafael (Mr.)$1,698.00109/21/2007
10Miller, Harriet (Mrs.)$1,105.93111/02/2004
11Meyer, Morgan D. (The Honorable)$350.00106/14/2017

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
8 72.7% 1,958 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
8 72.7% 3,017 0.3%
DALLAS MORNING NEWS
Vendor ID 83058
7 63.6% 187 3.7%
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
7 63.6% 947 0.7%
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Vendor ID 214994
6 54.5% 377 1.6%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
6 54.5% 785 0.8%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
6 54.5% 906 0.7%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
6 54.5% 1,327 0.5%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
6 54.5% 1,174 0.5%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
6 54.5% 1,536 0.4%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
6 54.5% 1,445 0.4%
DALLAS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 82685
5 45.5% 218 2.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
04/02/2026Highland Park Community League$11,090.00Advertising Expense
09/27/2024Scots 4 Scots PAC$2,445.00Advertisement
04/01/2018University Park Community League$1,290.00Advertising
06/14/2017Meyer, Morgan D. (The Honorable)$350.00July edition coloring book page from MMFT
02/05/2014Westcott, Chart (Mr.)$6,600.00Campaign advertising
07/09/2012Texans for Dan Branch$3,000.00community group event sponsorship
08/11/2011Texans for Dan Branch$1,000.00community group sponsor
07/12/2011Texans for Dan Branch$2,842.00community group sponsor
05/12/2010University Park Community League$40.00Balance owed on Political ad for May 8 election
05/12/2010University Park Community League$40.00Balance owed on Political ad for May 8 election
04/28/2010University Park Community League$200.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/28/2010University Park Community League$200.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/28/2010University Park Community League$200.00balance owed on newspaper ad for may 8 election
04/26/2010University Park Community League$780.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/26/2010University Park Community League$780.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/26/2010University Park Community League$780.00Newspaper ad for May 8 election
04/13/2010University Park Community League$780.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/13/2010University Park Community League$780.00Campaign ad for Park Cities People Newspaper
04/13/2010University Park Community League$780.00Newspaper ad for 5/8 election
10/08/2009Texans for Dan Branch$49.00community newspaper subscription expense
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.