Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Payment Tech

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 240297 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$20,144.69
Client Filers
4
Payments
92
Activity Range
01/31/2006–06/02/2026
Largest Payment
$1,872.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 92 payments · $20,144.69 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$19,225.177606/02/2026
2Texas Right To Life PAC$521.211309/05/2017
3Weiman, Lawrence D. (The Honorable)$314.18210/21/2016
4Travis County Republican Party$84.13101/31/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Vendor ID 14540
3 75.0% 557 0.5%
GODADDY.COM
Vendor ID 130520
3 75.0% 652 0.5%
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
3 75.0% 947 0.3%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
3 75.0% 1,360 0.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
3 75.0% 1,876 0.2%
Victory Solutions
Vendor ID 344760
2 50.0% 7 22.2%
JONATHAN STICKLAND CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169195
2 50.0% 56 3.4%
STATE COMPTROLLER
Vendor ID 295268
2 50.0% 59 3.3%
Dialing Services
Vendor ID 89904
2 50.0% 65 3.0%
VISA
Vendor ID 345623
2 50.0% 66 2.9%
IRS
Vendor ID 158641
2 50.0% 118 1.7%
MATT KRAUSE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 206152
2 50.0% 114 1.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/02/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$14.68Monthly Fee
05/04/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$9.95Monthly Fee
04/02/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$504.23Credit card fee
03/02/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$22.80Monthly fee
02/02/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$38.35Monthly fee
01/02/2026Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$9.95Monthly fee
12/02/2025Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$9.95monthly fee
11/03/2025Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$9.95monthly fee
10/02/2025Fort Worth Apartment Association Political Action Committee$9.95monthly fee
08/15/2024Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$121.03Bank fees
06/15/2024Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$42.40Bank fees
04/15/2024Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$543.68Credit card processing fees
12/15/2023Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$54.90Credit card fees
11/15/2023Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$1,872.00Credit card fees
03/15/2023Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$86.10credit card fees
02/15/2023Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$84.85credit card fees
01/15/2023Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$84.85credit card fees
11/15/2022Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$491.96Credit card fees
08/15/2022Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$595.00credit card fees
06/15/2022Apartment Association of Tarrant County Political Action Committee$108.00Credit card fees
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.