Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
PATRICK ROSE CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 239453 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$493,784.34
Client Filers
109
Payments
373
Activity Range
05/15/2002–10/28/2010
Largest Payment
$40,000.00
Graph: 109 connected filers · 373 payments · $493,784.34 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Patrick Rose Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
81 | 74.3% | 325 | 22.9% |
|
CHUCK HOPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62632
|
75 | 68.8% | 172 | 36.4% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
74 | 67.9% | 187 | 33.3% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
71 | 65.1% | 213 | 28.3% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
71 | 65.1% | 230 | 26.5% |
|
MIKE JACKSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213615
|
70 | 64.2% | 162 | 34.8% |
|
MARK HOMER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 203518
|
69 | 63.3% | 132 | 40.1% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
69 | 63.3% | 295 | 20.6% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
69 | 63.3% | 325 | 18.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
69 | 63.3% | 386 | 16.2% |
|
CRAIG ESTES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78091
|
68 | 62.4% | 163 | 33.3% |
|
JIM PITTS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165491
|
68 | 62.4% | 189 | 29.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2010 | AT&T Texas PAC | $1,000.00 | Patrick Rose STATE HOUSE 45th TX |
| 10/28/2010 | Comerica Inc. PAC | $500.00 | Desc:Direct Contribution |
| 10/28/2010 | American Pharmacy Coalition Inc. GPAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/27/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $15,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/27/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $15,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/26/2010 | Texas Podiatric Medical PAC | $500.00 | donation |
| 10/21/2010 | HOSPAC-State The Political Action Committee of The Texas Hospital Association | $100.00 | Patrick Rose STATE HOUSE 45th TX |
| 10/18/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $25,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/18/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $25,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/18/2010 | Texas AFT Committee on Political Education | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/15/2010 | Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen | $300.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/14/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $5,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/14/2010 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform | $5,000.00 | campaign contribution / HD 45 (D) |
| 10/13/2010 | Medical Defense Political Action Committee | $12,500.00 | Patrick Rose STATE HOUSE 45th TX |
| 10/13/2010 | Forestar Committee for Responsible Government | $1,000.00 | Contribution TX House District 45 |
| 10/10/2010 | Texas Construction Association PAC | $1,000.00 | HD45 |
| 09/30/2010 | Consulting Engineers PAC | $250.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 09/27/2010 | Medical Defense Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Patrick Rose STATE HOUSE 45th TX |
| 09/27/2010 | Valero Energy Corporation Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Patrick Rose - TX - Support |
| 09/27/2010 | Texas Assn of Mortgage Brokers PAC | $250.00 | Political Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.