Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
POSTAL SERVICE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 248035 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$9,806.91
Client Filers
9
Payments
76
Activity Range
08/01/2003–12/31/2021
Largest Payment
$576.64
Graph: 9 connected filers · 76 payments · $9,806.91 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- POSTAL SERVICE
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flores, Ismael | $4,310.88 | 41 | 12/03/2009 |
| 2 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $4,126.48 | 17 | 10/04/2011 |
| 3 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $410.15 | 9 | 12/13/2019 |
| 4 | Mesquite Republican Women's PAC | $372.00 | 2 | 12/31/2021 |
| 5 | Rios Ybarra, Tara (Dr.) | $221.40 | 2 | 12/21/2007 |
| 6 | Reyna, Felipe | $148.00 | 2 | 05/24/2005 |
| 7 | Windcrest Wins PAC | $113.00 | 1 | 02/13/2014 |
| 8 | Smith, Steven Wayne (Mr.) | $68.00 | 1 | 03/30/2004 |
| 9 | Van De Putte, Leticia | $37.00 | 1 | 08/01/2003 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
6 | 66.7% | 1,876 | 0.3% |
|
MICHAELS
Vendor ID 212366
|
5 | 55.6% | 366 | 1.4% |
|
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 336943
|
5 | 55.6% | 557 | 0.9% |
|
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
|
5 | 55.6% | 614 | 0.8% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
5 | 55.6% | 696 | 0.7% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,101 | 0.5% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,327 | 0.4% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,360 | 0.4% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,174 | 0.4% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 55.6% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
5 | 55.6% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
STRIPES
Vendor ID 298076
|
4 | 44.4% | 315 | 1.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/31/2021 | Mesquite Republican Women's PAC | $204.00 | PO Box rental for one year |
| 12/08/2020 | Mesquite Republican Women's PAC | $168.00 | Rent for Post Office Box |
| 12/13/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $14.35 | Stamps |
| 10/24/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $5.00 | Postage |
| 10/24/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $1.45 | Postage |
| 07/10/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $70.00 | Membership Mailer |
| 07/10/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $7.75 | Certified Mail |
| 07/10/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $7.60 | certified mail |
| 05/28/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $140.00 | PO Box |
| 03/21/2016 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $82.00 | check # 1742 |
| 02/13/2014 | Windcrest Wins PAC | $113.00 | MAIL BOX RENTAL |
| 10/04/2011 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $190.00 | Renewing permit number |
| 09/28/2011 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $47.52 | Returned mail fee |
| 09/08/2011 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $444.00 | Postage |
| 08/29/2011 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $576.64 | Adding funds to permint number |
| 08/22/2011 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $88.00 | Stamps |
| 05/27/2010 | Rodriguez, Jose (Mr.) | $44.00 | Postage -letters to constituents |
| 12/03/2009 | Flores, Ismael | $17.50 | stamps |
| 07/07/2009 | Flores, Ismael | $44.00 | stamps |
| 02/13/2008 | Flores, Ismael | $82.00 | stamps |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.