Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Office Depot OfficeMax

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Retail Operations
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 230641 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$14,719.90
Client Filers
12
Payments
74
Activity Range
08/26/2015–10/28/2025
Largest Payment
$638.75
Graph: 12 connected filers · 74 payments · $14,719.90 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$7,856.942302/20/2024
2Gutierrez, Rolando (The Honorable)$4,171.462001/04/2025
3Vote Yes For Our Kids$1,063.80405/12/2017
4The Dallas County East Democrats$408.441203/11/2021
5Palestine Peace Officers Association PAC$277.76106/04/2022
6Texas Senate Democratic Caucus$277.45506/16/2016
7Cannaday, Rose A. (Ms.)$229.74103/13/2024
8Bell County Texas Democratic Women$173.70410/04/2019
9Leander Firefighters for Responsible Government$141.59107/23/2024
10Meyer, Morgan D. (The Honorable)$66.00110/13/2020
11Hendricks, Jeremy (Mr.)$39.19110/28/2025
12Kling, Steven D. (Mr.)$13.83102/16/2018

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
8 66.7% 1,445 0.6%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
7 58.3% 1,480 0.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
7 58.3% 1,958 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
7 58.3% 3,017 0.2%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
6 50.0% 1,101 0.5%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
6 50.0% 1,174 0.5%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
6 50.0% 1,638 0.4%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
6 50.0% 1,876 0.3%
H-E-B
Vendor ID 137475
5 41.7% 242 2.0%
MICHAELS
Vendor ID 212366
5 41.7% 366 1.3%
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
5 41.7% 553 0.9%
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
5 41.7% 592 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/28/2025Hendricks, Jeremy (Mr.)$39.19Office expenses
01/04/2025Gutierrez, Rolando (The Honorable)$541.24Office supplies
07/23/2024Leander Firefighters for Responsible Government$141.59Office supplies.
03/13/2024Cannaday, Rose A. (Ms.)$229.74Office Supplies
02/20/2024Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$493.58campaign office supplies
02/20/2024Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$402.71campaign office supplies
02/20/2024Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$300.36campaign office supplies
06/04/2022Palestine Peace Officers Association PAC$277.76Campaign flyers/handouts
03/11/2021The Dallas County East Democrats$59.03SIGNS FOR BLOCK WALK
10/22/2020Gutierrez, Rolando (The Honorable)$221.62CAMPAIGN SUPPLIES
10/16/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$550.00Office Supplies
10/15/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$550.00Office Supplies
10/13/2020Meyer, Morgan D. (The Honorable)$66.00Envelopes for campaign materials
10/11/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$495.00Office Supplies
09/30/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$638.75Office Supplies
09/29/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$125.66Office Supplies
07/07/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$395.69Office Supplies
07/05/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$550.00Office Supplies
07/05/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$220.00Office Supplies
07/03/2020Jetton, Jacey R. (The Honorable)$165.00Office Supplies Expense
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.