Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Office Depot/ Office Max
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 230744 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,230.34
Client Filers
3
Payments
32
Activity Range
06/09/2016–10/24/2019
Largest Payment
$193.72
Graph: 3 connected filers · 32 payments · $1,230.34 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Office Depot/ Office Max
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $883.56 | 20 | 12/15/2016 |
| 2 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $313.76 | 10 | 10/24/2019 |
| 3 | Ruzza, Janet (Ms.) | $33.02 | 2 | 10/12/2018 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DILLARD'S
Vendor ID 90881
|
2 | 66.7% | 87 | 2.3% |
|
HYATT REGENCY
Vendor ID 154347
|
2 | 66.7% | 249 | 0.8% |
|
MICHAEL'S
Vendor ID 212274
|
2 | 66.7% | 349 | 0.6% |
|
MICHAELS
Vendor ID 212366
|
2 | 66.7% | 366 | 0.5% |
|
US POST OFFICE
Vendor ID 340255
|
2 | 66.7% | 431 | 0.5% |
|
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
|
2 | 66.7% | 553 | 0.4% |
|
UPS STORE
Vendor ID 339679
|
2 | 66.7% | 503 | 0.4% |
|
BANK OF AMERICA
Vendor ID 27103
|
2 | 66.7% | 640 | 0.3% |
|
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
|
2 | 66.7% | 578 | 0.3% |
|
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
|
2 | 66.7% | 734 | 0.3% |
|
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
|
2 | 66.7% | 785 | 0.3% |
|
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
|
2 | 66.7% | 734 | 0.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $46.33 | Programs |
| 07/10/2019 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $14.49 | certificates |
| 10/12/2018 | Ruzza, Janet (Ms.) | $16.51 | Reducing, Copying, Cutting cardstock |
| 09/23/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $8.43 | Paper |
| 07/27/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $88.74 | ink cartridges for printer |
| 05/21/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $21.22 | Information for May meeting |
| 04/30/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $10.81 | Flash Drive |
| 04/26/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $58.92 | Newsletter Agenda Flyers |
| 04/11/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $19.80 | Letters to potential members |
| 02/28/2018 | Kingwood Area Republican Women's Club | $23.80 | Ink cartridge for Printer |
| 12/15/2016 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $41.63 | Office Supplies and Name Badges |
| 12/05/2016 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $41.63 | Office Supplies |
| 11/05/2016 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $193.72 | Office supplies |
| 11/04/2016 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $75.76 | Office Supplies |
| 11/02/2016 | Neave, Victoria (The Honorable) | $32.45 | Office Supplies |
| 10/26/2016 | Neave, Victoria (Ms.) | $9.19 | Office supplies |
| 10/23/2016 | Neave, Victoria (Ms.) | $56.64 | Office supplies |
| 09/24/2016 | Neave, Victoria (Ms.) | $61.54 | Office Supplies |
| 09/08/2016 | Neave, Victoria (Ms.) | $41.31 | Office Supplies |
| 09/08/2016 | Neave, Victoria (Ms.) | $31.83 | Office Supplies |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.