Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

North Texas Mailing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 227642 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$180,707.12
Client Filers
14
Payments
102
Activity Range
10/30/2000–02/15/2010
Largest Payment
$16,043.71
Graph: 14 connected filers · 102 payments · $180,707.12 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$51,977.541202/15/2010
2Denton County Republican Party$24,650.36911/21/2008
3Wilson for Texas Senate$23,751.321812/04/2001
4Mazzant III, Amos (Mr.)$20,805.83612/05/2004
5Phillips, Lawrence$14,950.691810/31/2008
6Grunden, Ricky (Mr.)$10,732.37402/22/2006
7Savoie, Michael (Dr.)$8,047.67203/01/2006
8Blake, Laurine$7,084.63802/28/2008
9Grayson County Republican Party$5,876.65902/15/2010
10Denton County Republican Party Executive Committee$5,090.41510/18/2007
11CLIFFORD, ERIC (Mr.)$3,726.24410/27/2008
12Rivera-Worley, Carmen (Ms.)$2,752.12205/08/2007
13Hunter, Barcus (Mr.)$779.04202/22/2008
14Corinth Together$482.25304/25/2001

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Eagle Press
Vendor ID 97510
10 71.4% 21 40.0%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
8 57.1% 1,571 0.5%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
8 57.1% 3,017 0.3%
DENTON COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 88779
7 50.0% 149 4.5%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
7 50.0% 1,360 0.5%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
6 42.9% 1,045 0.6%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
6 42.9% 1,876 0.3%
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
5 35.7% 946 0.5%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
5 35.7% 1,327 0.4%
Texoma Enterprise
Vendor ID 314888
4 28.6% 8 22.2%
Van Alstyne Leader
Vendor ID 342553
4 28.6% 8 22.2%
HERALD DEMOCRAT
Vendor ID 144012
4 28.6% 28 10.5%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/15/2010Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$7,889.85Mailing of third mailer
02/15/2010Grayson County Republican Party$617.64Lincoln Day Dinner Invitations
02/04/2010Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$7,889.85Mailing of second mailer
01/24/2010Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$8,828.77Mailing of first mailer
11/21/2008Denton County Republican Party$950.43Newsletter Postage-64%
10/31/2008Phillips, Lawrence$400.87Mail Prep for Campaign Mailing
10/27/2008CLIFFORD, ERIC (Mr.)$1,481.58mass mailing expense
10/20/2008Phillips, Lawrence$781.69Mailing set-up for campaign mail
10/20/2008CLIFFORD, ERIC (Mr.)$625.05mass mailing expense
10/10/2008CLIFFORD, ERIC (Mr.)$1,331.90mass mailing expense
10/02/2008CLIFFORD, ERIC (Mr.)$287.71mass mailing expense
09/13/2008Denton County Republican Party$1,118.35Newsletter Postage-64%
03/26/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$5,900.00Runoff Election Mailing of Campaign Literature
03/26/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$5,900.00Runoff Election Mailing of Campaign Literature
03/26/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$1,325.20Runoff Election Mailing of Campaign Literature
03/26/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$1,325.20Runoff Election Mailing of Campaign Literature
02/28/2008Blake, Laurine$790.99Advertising
02/25/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$3,524.642nd Mailing of Campaign Literature
02/25/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$3,524.642nd Mailing of Campaign Literature
02/25/2008Burgess, Steven (Mr.)$500.002nd Mailing of Campaign Literature
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.