Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Neel and Partners
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 223913 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$326,752.28
Client Filers
6
Payments
70
Activity Range
11/01/2021–03/03/2026
Largest Payment
$26,992.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 70 payments · $326,752.28 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Neel and Partners
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $171,305.56 | 36 | 03/03/2026 |
| 2 | Gallo Jr., Vincent J. (Mr.) | $55,939.82 | 12 | 02/05/2024 |
| 3 | Virdell, Wesley W. (Mr.) | $51,924.44 | 8 | 02/01/2022 |
| 4 | Lavender, George E. (Mr.) | $35,597.90 | 6 | 02/14/2022 |
| 5 | Firsing, Scott T. (Mr.) | $6,084.56 | 3 | 10/23/2024 |
| 6 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $5,900.00 | 5 | 11/13/2025 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,638 | 0.2% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,571 | 0.2% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,958 | 0.2% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,876 | 0.2% |
|
COA PARKING
Vendor ID 68041
|
2 | 33.3% | 11 | 13.3% |
|
DISCOUNT TIRE
Vendor ID 91392
|
2 | 33.3% | 58 | 3.2% |
|
I360
Vendor ID 154848
|
2 | 33.3% | 64 | 2.9% |
|
HILTON AUSTIN
Vendor ID 146108
|
2 | 33.3% | 99 | 1.9% |
|
PANDA EXPRESS
Vendor ID 236656
|
2 | 33.3% | 103 | 1.9% |
|
ZAZZLE
Vendor ID 360421
|
2 | 33.3% | 105 | 1.8% |
|
TDCJ
Vendor ID 305990
|
2 | 33.3% | 116 | 1.7% |
|
MAIL CHIMP
Vendor ID 200616
|
2 | 33.3% | 138 | 1.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $1,050.42 | Texting |
| 02/19/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $7,269.06 | Online advertising and texting |
| 02/17/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $3,384.16 | Texting |
| 02/09/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $15,886.57 | Mailer and text |
| 02/05/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $11,000.00 | Online advertising |
| 02/03/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $2,400.00 | Consulting fee |
| 01/30/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $12,773.40 | Mailer, texting, social media ads |
| 01/05/2026 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $8,204.74 | Consulting, Texting, Mailing. |
| 12/03/2025 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $2,400.00 | Consulting service |
| 11/13/2025 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $650.00 | Campaign Voter Database software |
| 11/05/2025 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $2,400.00 | Consulting service |
| 11/04/2025 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $1,500.00 | Campaign Website |
| 11/04/2025 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $500.00 | photography |
| 11/04/2025 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $250.00 | Campaign Push Cards |
| 11/03/2025 | Horton, Bradley R. (Ms.) | $3,000.00 | Political consulting expense |
| 10/23/2024 | Firsing, Scott T. (Mr.) | $2,345.04 | Text Messages |
| 10/17/2024 | Firsing, Scott T. (Mr.) | $2,345.04 | Text messages |
| 10/02/2024 | Firsing, Scott T. (Mr.) | $1,394.48 | Text messages |
| 03/05/2024 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $924.00 | Texting |
| 03/04/2024 | Glass, Tom (Mr.) | $2,500.00 | Facebook ads |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.