Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

NE Loop 410 LLC, a Delware LLC

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 223702 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$41,586.35
Client Filers
2
Payments
18
Activity Range
06/25/2024–03/01/2026
Largest Payment
$4,490.13
Graph: 2 connected filers · 18 payments · $41,586.35 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$29,297.061403/01/2026
2Bexar County Republican Party (P)$12,289.29401/01/2026

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Alamo Towers LLC
Vendor ID 9744
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Catto & Catto
Vendor ID 54910
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Copy Products of SA
Vendor ID 74909
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Heritage on 281 LLC
Vendor ID 144185
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Native Vision
Vendor ID 223250
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Print RX
Vendor ID 250108
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
UBEO Business Services LLC
Vendor ID 337135
2 100.0% 2 100.0%
Copy Products of San Antonio
Vendor ID 74910
2 100.0% 3 66.7%
De Lage Landen Financial
Vendor ID 86401
2 100.0% 3 66.7%
World Wide Wireless
Vendor ID 357353
2 100.0% 3 66.7%
UBEO LLC
Vendor ID 337136
2 100.0% 4 50.0%
DigiPrint
Vendor ID 90665
2 100.0% 5 40.0%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/01/2026Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$2,000.00Monthly RPBC Hqtrs rent for the month of March 2026.
01/01/2026Bexar County Republican Party (P)$4,490.13Rent for the month of January 2026.
12/01/2025Bexar County Republican Party (P)$3,899.58December rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
11/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79November 2025 rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
10/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79October rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
08/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79August 2025 rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
07/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79Monthly rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
06/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79Rent for the month of June 2025, RPBC Hqtrs office.
05/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79May 2025 rent payment for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
04/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79April 2025 rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
03/01/2025Bexar County Republican Party (P)$1,949.79Monthly rent expense for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
02/01/2025Bexar County Republican Party (P)$1,949.79January 2025 office rent for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
01/01/2025Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79RPBC Hqtrs Office Rent for January 2025.
12/01/2024Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79RPBC Hqtrs office rent for the month of December 2024.
11/06/2024Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79Rent for the month of November 2024.
10/01/2024Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79October 2024, monthly rent for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
08/01/2024Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$1,949.79Aug 2024
06/25/2024Republican Party of Bexar County (CEC)$3,899.58 July 2024 rent for the RPBC Hqtrs office.
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.